AMD64 .09 faster per clock? a closer look

ocpinoy · Nov 3, 2004

i donno if any of you noticed, but i was looking at this anandtech review, and they compared the "AMD64 .09" and the "AMD64 .13" and i noticed that they compaired them at the same mhz, but there no such thing as a "AMD64 .13" on socket 939.. so what your compairing is a single channel processor to a dual channel processor at the same speeds, no wonder, the "AMD64 .09" is faster...

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipset...aspx?i=2242&p=4

or am i missing something here

9mmCensor · Nov 4, 2004

discussed here
http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=340482

hitechjb1 · Nov 4, 2004

A 130 nm 3500+ 939 dual channel CPU (revision CG) was compared with a 90 nm 3200+ 939 dual channel CPU (revision D0), both were running at same frequencies.

CandymanCan · Nov 4, 2004

ocpinoy said:
i donno if any of you noticed, but i was looking at this anandtech review, and they compared the "AMD64 .09" and the "AMD64 .13" and i noticed that they compaired them at the same mhz, but there no such thing as a "AMD64 .13" on socket 939.. so what your compairing is a single channel processor to a dual channel processor at the same speeds, no wonder, the "AMD64 .09" is faster...

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipset...aspx?i=2242&p=4

or am i missing something here

Thier is a 3500+ 3800+ both of which are 130nm and S939

AMD64 .09 faster per clock? a closer look

ocpinoy

Registered

9mmCensor

Disabled

hitechjb1

Senior Member

CandymanCan

Disabled

Similar threads