0 mb of system memory?

Tyranos

Member

​

Joined

Jul 20, 2001

Location

OR

• Jun 25, 2007

• #1

Haven't come across this one yet.. 3dmark2001's system details will show 0mb total physical memory. Running 3dmark results in *** performance, ~59k 3dmarks as opposed to ~67k.

 

Automata

Destroyer of Empires and Use

​

Joined

May 15, 2006

• Jun 25, 2007

• #2

Maybe it is a bug as I see you have 8gb of memory...what about the newer 3dmark?

 

Fr3@k3r

Member

​

Joined

Jul 31, 2005

Location

(Lat 47° 8' 22.1316")(Long -122° 29' 52.9152") (La

• Jun 25, 2007

• #3

Does 3dmark support more than 4gb of ram?

 

OP

Tyranos

Member

​

Joined

Jul 20, 2001

Location

OR

• Jun 25, 2007

• Thread Starter
• #4

Not sure, I'm running the latest version of 2001 before it was discontinued (330).. I'll cry out to the heavens if I can't run 2001 as my fave benchmark anymore. 06 runs, and gets slightly lower performance but close enough for the most part.

 

inkfx

Member

​

Joined

Oct 8, 2004

Location

San Antonio, Texas

• Jun 25, 2007

• #5

Did you try pulling out the sticks and go down to like 2-4gb to see if that was the case?

 

El<(')>Maxi

Blank Senior Member

​

Joined

May 1, 2003

Location

Seattle

• Jun 25, 2007

• #6

LOL, 8GB and it thinks you have 0

I wonder if 01 uses a direcpll.dll similar to 05/06? I could also be a Vista problem.

 

palesicklydwarf

Member

​

Joined

Feb 9, 2005

• Jul 31, 2007

• #7

I ran into that numerous times back when I actually cared about benchmarking things. I believe it was indeed a bug that they apparently never fixed.