IDK I'm sure there are better ways to compare, but...... 179.99(fx8350)+119.99(h110i gt)=299.98 VS 339.99(4790k)
And obviosuly Its OC'd(4.8gHz) and I replaced the stock cooler(same results could probably be had with a cheaper high end air cooler as well). A little bit more work and a savings of ~$40 = roughly the same performance. Or at least as far as just the cpu is concerned. IDK what intel board would compare soOooo.
View attachment 173013
AMD mobo necessary to get to 4.8Ghz (Sabertooth or other
from this thread): $180
Intel mobo cable to running a 4790K at stock (from your bench comparison above): any socket 1150 will do this, but for simplicity, I'll just pick the cheapest Z97 - $100
And you can use the stock HSF from a 4790K, so no cost there.
Even if you bought a cooler cheaper than the H110i for your 8350, I would say you're spending at least $60 to keep it from thermal throttling, so the
real math is:
AMD: $180 (CPU) + $180(mobo) + $60(cooler) = $420
Intel: $340(CPU,cooler) + $100(mobo) = $440
That's a $20 difference, which vanishes when you factor in the
PSU requirement difference...
And with that in mind, let's visit your benchmark.
#1, how comprehensive is the built-in CPU-z bench? I've never seen it thrown around as a popular metric...
Since you did, however, that data reads to me in favor of the 4790K. Single thread performance is what will matter for users 95% of the time. Very few applications (and no games) benefit from 8 cores/8 threads (which I'm assuming is the bottom chart). In the chart that matters (top one), therefore, the Intel shows 25% performance difference (to the good).
Add a $25 212 EVO to the 4790K, and you can tack on another 10% to its performance (that cooler probably wouldn't be able to dissipate the heat from the 8350...).
Bottom line, FX series CPUs haven't been competitive since the 2nd gen Intel i5 and i7 were released. It's truly a shame that they aren't too. That's the reason Intel increased the prices on Skylake