- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
I've come across some articles in the past that seemed to suggest it was better for gaming to have higher clockspeed w/fewer cores than more cores and a lower clockspeed. So if we had say, a 4-core Intel CPU running at a really high clock rate (5+ Ghz let's say) would that be better than having a slower 8-core Intel CPU running at say 4.4 Ghz for gaming?
I know that there's more hardware and software overhead assorted w/having more cores. For hardware, cache coherency for an 8 core CPU has to consume more resources than for a 4 core CPU and there must be more contention issues for access to L3 cache and memory.
I know that there's more hardware and software overhead assorted w/having more cores. For hardware, cache coherency for an 8 core CPU has to consume more resources than for a 4 core CPU and there must be more contention issues for access to L3 cache and memory.