- Joined
- Oct 14, 2007
My guess is that difference is outside the margin of error?
Heh, considering I get a whopping 25-30 points out of a 400 MHz increase in CPU overclock, I'd say probably so.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
My guess is that difference is outside the margin of error?
So right now because of the level of hardware the difference seems significant. In the future it might not look so big. Well I guess we'll have to report folks using physx on that bench too.......Heh, considering I get a whopping 25-30 points out of a 400 MHz increase in CPU overclock, I'd say probably so.
So right now because of the level of hardware the difference seems significant. In the future it might not look so big. Well I guess we'll have to report folks using physx on that bench too.......
Dang....I've got some work to do in 3D benching
I just noticed... Gimme that team ref clock record
I just noticed... Gimme that team ref clock record
I love these real-time team rankings.
Curious thing, I'm not in the list even when I have a Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5 @ 350MHz on reference clock
You have to submit the reference clock as a separate benchmark. There are no points to be gained from it, but bragging rights is always nice.
That reminds me... I have 562ish... to submit.
Hey all, was talking to a couple of the guys in IMOG's broadcast last night and they convinced me to start benching for OC Forums. Just benching my gaming PC at the moment, but the benching PC should be here next week. LN2 fun soon after. Looking forward to chatting with everyone.