- Joined
- Oct 11, 2005
- Location
- Tau'ri
Whe I see 800MHz at 4 cas.. i think 400 at 2cas (dayum fast)
Yup RW speeds went up... but they went up with sata 2 also....
Just like HDDs latencies are worse..
does ayone else get the idea that technology in some aspects has not really improved over the last 10 years as far as memory/storage..only been slowly released to the public for sustained economic growth?
Im reminscent of some becnhmarks I saw a couple years back.. .with LAtencies in the low 30s on 939 and in the 60s for ddr2 CPUs... evne htough teh ddr2 was apprachin 10G but only 5G in the opposite (read or write I forget...) DDR was even R and W...
So am I crazy? Is that why my 4600 x2 at stock felt better hen my e6300 at 3.5GHz?
Yup RW speeds went up... but they went up with sata 2 also....
Just like HDDs latencies are worse..
does ayone else get the idea that technology in some aspects has not really improved over the last 10 years as far as memory/storage..only been slowly released to the public for sustained economic growth?
Im reminscent of some becnhmarks I saw a couple years back.. .with LAtencies in the low 30s on 939 and in the 60s for ddr2 CPUs... evne htough teh ddr2 was apprachin 10G but only 5G in the opposite (read or write I forget...) DDR was even R and W...
So am I crazy? Is that why my 4600 x2 at stock felt better hen my e6300 at 3.5GHz?