- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
just wondering if 38s is good for a newcastle at 235fsb and 2.35GHz? I hear superpi cant really take advantage of a64s so they barely beat athlon xps
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
superpi 1m 38s normal for 235x10 a64?
- Thread starter Overclocker550
- Start date
CandymanCan
Disabled
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2003
- Location
- Woodbridge, Va
Looks normal the highest i got was 31S but thats was @ 284x9
OP
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Thread Starter
- #3
err your 2.55GHz beat me by 7s? is your ram 1:1 2-2-2-5 at 284fsb then??????
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
I wonder what speed of the A64 we'll need to beat the 25s 1m superpi record set by the 5.4GHz prescott.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
Killa-AMD said:
What
SJ
OP
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Thread Starter
- #8
then theres something wrong with my superPI scores and I should be getting less than 30s if hes getting 32s at 2GHz!!!!!!!!!
CandymanCan
Disabled
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2003
- Location
- Woodbridge, Va
Overclocker550 said:
My ram is 1:1 @ 3-4-4-8-1t @ 284mhzx9 4xHTT 2550mhz when i did that and i got 31 seconds
Ram speed also plays a role in this not just cpu speed.
Last edited:
OP
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Thread Starter
- #10
but your timings are very bad, ah well forget superpi, it does not relate to 3dmark and gaming, in 3dmark and games I would totally crush you. I bet im beating you in 3dmark in car chase high by alot, what fps do u get there
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
Yeah, overclocker550, ofcourse, he only got a 6800 @ Ultra speeds and you will absolutely devostate him with your WAY lower HTT speed and your most powerfull Ti4200!
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2004
- Location
- Hagerstown, Maryland
Pwnt.
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Location
- TEH INTERNETS
Overclocker550 said:
So suddenly superPI which you just made a thread about asking for soundings is worthless? Why make a thread then? Or is it because he just beat you by a whole 7 seconds.
OP
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Thread Starter
- #14
I should be getting like 30s or better in superPI but im getting good performance in everything so I dont care much, just wondering what was up with superPI
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2004
- Location
- Hessen, Germany
Killa-AMD said:
What?? I have @ stock 3000+, BH-5 @ 2-2-2 1t and get then 45sec.
I did never see anything better than 33sec, even with 2.6GHz... remember my BH-5 ran 2-2-2-5/11 with 1t command rate.
I cannot explain this.
Ok, maybe I can, but then the DFI is crap
CandymanCan
Disabled
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2003
- Location
- Woodbridge, Va
Overclocker550 said:
Timmings for A64's dont matter at all when youre memory/HTT speeds are very high like mine.
My Speeds around 280mhz 1:1 will crush anything @ 250 1:1 and lower using 2-2-2-5 timmings.
Btw i get 22k by doing all the tests cept nature, how do you think youre ganan crush me in 3dmark whe nu cant reach 20 k ?
Here is my 3dmark01 score. The only test you'll prob beat me in in Car chase high, thats because the 6800gt isnt very good in the ancient Dx7. Also i was never really good at 3dmark01, test 1 varies by so much fps each time you run it its a pitful test to compare by, Run AquaMark3 that test is better then 01 and tell me what ur cpu score is.. Btw if you look at ALL the 6800Gt and Athlon 64 scores that are around my score and under, you will notice that ALL the car chase high are equal to me or near it by 2-5 fps. This test has nothing to do with the cpu and HTT speed its the vid card " that being the 6800 that is the limiting factor here.. Go to the Nv section ask people thier they will tell you the car disnt ver yfast in DX7 and DX8 only in DX9 it flys.
Btw name one game that uses DX7 like car chase High does that isnt 2-3 years old and that i dont get 300fps or higher to notice the 10-20 that u have over me in car high. Judging from you post's you seem to know nothing about the A64's and how they work you are also outdated in video card's performance on today's cards.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8151583
Here is my AquaMark score if u wanna compare that also, its better then 01 for comparing cpu scores.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1154971041
Here are some comparisions for you. Unknown cpu means its an A64. Take a look at Car high were similer. Nuff said. Yes i know my Car low sux but im not a big 01 person i dunno what order to ru nthe testsi n and which like what better. I just run them all in the order they came in
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8056495
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7987690
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8099011
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8122362
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8056495
Last edited:
OP
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2002
- Thread Starter
- #17
well I just hit 37s now at 235x10 so its a little better. I was probably a fraction of a second away from 37s anyway and I tweaked a few more timings for that. still I am a far cry from Killa-AMD's 32s with stock 3000+
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2004
Killa-AMD said:
Well it would be good, but i really dont think that its possible, at your clock speeds, if you are using the same Super PI that we are
try re downloading it, and reistalling it.
you can download it here
ftp://pi.super-computing.org/windows/super_pi.zip
be sure your running the 1M test
Gl
-Jess-
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
and post a screenshot of it along side a screenshot of gcpuid to show your speed.
