- Joined
- Nov 6, 2003
- Location
- Denver, CO
WORK IN PROGRESS! WILL BE DONE SOON! WORKS CITED COMING SOON!
I feel like adressing the issue of what throws off more heat. Also, this will provide some general knowledge to OCforums on how much heat different modern CPU's generate.
Now, to be perfectly clear, this information is from other websites, so refer to the works cited.
KEY:
*= Mobile CPU unless it has its own category
**= Low power or ULV variant.
***=1MB Cache Athlon 64's
****= Maximum thermal design power rating for the entire line of processors. AMD seems to like giving out the maxTDP for an entire series vs. individual specifications for each processor. This bassically means that any CPU in that line should not run any warmer than the maxTDP. Now many models will run cooler than this figure.
AMD Socket 462
Athlon XP+MP
180nm Palomino
130nm Thouroughbred
130nm Barton
I don't have specs on the mobile Bartons at the moment but they are extremely self explanetory. 35 watt, 45 watt, etc.
130nm Thornton
Duron
180nm Morgan
130nm Applebred
Sempron
130nm Thornton + Barton
AMD Socket 754/939/940
Athlon 64
Newcastle
Clawhammer
Winchester
Athlon FX
Sledgehammer
Opteron
Sledgehammer rev. B3
Sledgehammer rev. C0
Sledgehammer rev. CG
Sledgehammer rev. CG LOW POWER
Sempron
130nm Paris @ 1.0GHz : 20 thermal watts @ 800MHz : 13 thermal watts *
130nm Paris 128KB L2 @ 1.0GHz : XX thermal watts @ 800MHz : 13 thermal watts *
Intel Socket 478/775
Pentium 4
Celeron
Pentium M
I feel like adressing the issue of what throws off more heat. Also, this will provide some general knowledge to OCforums on how much heat different modern CPU's generate.
Now, to be perfectly clear, this information is from other websites, so refer to the works cited.
KEY:
*= Mobile CPU unless it has its own category
**= Low power or ULV variant.
***=1MB Cache Athlon 64's
****= Maximum thermal design power rating for the entire line of processors. AMD seems to like giving out the maxTDP for an entire series vs. individual specifications for each processor. This bassically means that any CPU in that line should not run any warmer than the maxTDP. Now many models will run cooler than this figure.
AMD Socket 462
Athlon XP+MP
180nm Palomino
- 1500+ : 60 thermal watts
- 1600+ : 62.8 thermal watts
- 1700+ : 64 thermal watts
- 1800+ : 66 thermal watts
- 1900+ : 68 thermal watts
- 2000+ : 70 thermal watts
- 2100+ : 72 thermal watts
130nm Thouroughbred
- 1700+ : 49.4 thermal watts
- 1800+ : 51 thermal watts
- 1900+ : 52.5 thermal watts
- 2000+ : 60.3 thermal watts
- 2100+ : 62.1 thermal watts
- 2200+ : 62.8-67.9 thermal watts
- 2400+ : 65.3-68.3 thermal watts
- 2600+ : 68.3 thermal watts
- 2700+ : 68.3 thermal watts
- 2800+ : unkown (there were VERY few 2800 tbreds made)
130nm Barton
- 2500+ : 68.3 thermal watts
- 2600+ : 68.3 thermal watts
- 2800+ : 68.3 thermal watts
- 3000+ : 68.3-74.3 thermal watts
- 3200+ : 76.8 thermal watts
I don't have specs on the mobile Bartons at the moment but they are extremely self explanetory. 35 watt, 45 watt, etc.
130nm Thornton
- 2000+ : 60.3 thermal watts
- 2200+ : 62.8 thermal watts
- 2400+ : 68.3 thermal watts
Duron
180nm Morgan
- 900MHz : 42.7 thermal watts
- 950MHz : 44.4 thermal watts
- 1.0GHz : 46.1 thermal watts
- 1.1GHz : 50.3 thermal watts
- 1.2GHz : 54.7 thermal watts
- 1.3GHz : 60 thermal watts
130nm Applebred
- 1.4GHz : 57 thermal watts ****
- 1.6GHz : 57 thermal watts ****
- 1.8GHz : 57 thermal watts ****
Sempron
130nm Thornton + Barton
- 2200-3000+ (Including Barton core) : 62 thermal watts ****
AMD Socket 754/939/940
Athlon 64
Newcastle
- 2800+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3000+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3200+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3400+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3500+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3800+ : 89 thermal watts ****
Clawhammer
- 3200+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3400+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 3700+ : 89 thermal watts ****
- 4000+ : 89 thermal watts ****
Winchester
- 3000+ : 67 thermal watts ****
- 3200+ : 67 thermal watts ****
- 3500+ : 67 thermal watts ****
Athlon FX
Sledgehammer
- FX-51 : 89 thermal watts ****
- FX-53 : 89 thermal watts ****
- FX-55: 104 thermal watts
Opteron
Sledgehammer rev. B3
- X40 : 84.7 thermal watts ****
- X42 : 84.7 thermal watts ****
- X44 : 84.7 thermal watts ****
Sledgehammer rev. C0
- X40 : 82.1 thermal watts ****
- X42 : 82.1 thermal watts ****
- X44 : 82.1 thermal watts ****
- X46 : 89 thermal watts ****
- X48 : 89 thermal watts ****
Sledgehammer rev. CG
- X40 : 82.1 thermal watts ****
- X42 : 82.1 thermal watts ****
- X44 : 82.1 thermal watts ****
- X46 : 89 thermal watts ****
- X48 : 89 thermal watts ****
- X50 : 89 thermal watts ****
Sledgehammer rev. CG LOW POWER
- X40 : 22.5 thermal watts
- X46 : 39.2 thermal watts
Sempron
130nm Paris @ 1.0GHz : 20 thermal watts @ 800MHz : 13 thermal watts *
- 3100+ (130nm): 62 thermal watts ****
- 3000+ : 62 thermal watts * **** (Note: This is labeled "Athlon XP-M" but really is just like an Athlon 64 with only 256K)
130nm Paris 128KB L2 @ 1.0GHz : XX thermal watts @ 800MHz : 13 thermal watts *
- 2800+ : 62 thermal watts * ****(Note: This is labeled "Athlon XP-M" but really is just like an Athlon 64 with only 128K)
Intel Socket 478/775
Pentium 4
Celeron
Pentium M
Last edited: