- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051203/index.html
I think there had to be at least 20-30 different names of cores in that article. If anything its good from an information standpoint where Intel is going but of course lot of this stuff is very far off.
I think there had to be at least 20-30 different names of cores in that article. If anything its good from an information standpoint where Intel is going but of course lot of this stuff is very far off.