- Joined
- Mar 12, 2002
Ok so I cant really reveal to many details of where these questions come from, but I was interested in having a discussion on BT tech.
Basically I am working on a new product to allow for low power completely portable media transport from a number of sources. Now most mobile phones do not have the ability to create a wifi hotspot, but all have onboard bluetooth. Also most laptops these days also have BT support built in.
So according to the whitepapers BT3/4 have a limit of 24mbps transfer speed. While not a slouch by any means it certainly isnt blisteringly fast either.
So where I am at lets say due to low battery or just interference our device in question is only maintaining a 16mbps link. Assuming a maximum display size of 720P this leaves us with a bit of a quandry. Is this sufficient bandwidth to pass a minimally encoded/compressed video stream? Or is the smarter route to stress both devices a bit higher by forcing the host/server unit to do a high compression encoding on the stream and then also crank up the strain on the client device forcing to decode this compressed stream??
Ideally anything I can do to reduce overhead on the client side unit is preferable as it should improve battery life, and also reduce hardware cost on this unit. However, lower power usage at the cost of reliability of signal is absolutely not acceptable.
Opinions?
Basically I am working on a new product to allow for low power completely portable media transport from a number of sources. Now most mobile phones do not have the ability to create a wifi hotspot, but all have onboard bluetooth. Also most laptops these days also have BT support built in.
So according to the whitepapers BT3/4 have a limit of 24mbps transfer speed. While not a slouch by any means it certainly isnt blisteringly fast either.
So where I am at lets say due to low battery or just interference our device in question is only maintaining a 16mbps link. Assuming a maximum display size of 720P this leaves us with a bit of a quandry. Is this sufficient bandwidth to pass a minimally encoded/compressed video stream? Or is the smarter route to stress both devices a bit higher by forcing the host/server unit to do a high compression encoding on the stream and then also crank up the strain on the client device forcing to decode this compressed stream??
Ideally anything I can do to reduce overhead on the client side unit is preferable as it should improve battery life, and also reduce hardware cost on this unit. However, lower power usage at the cost of reliability of signal is absolutely not acceptable.
Opinions?