- Joined
- Sep 2, 2002
I assume the 400 would be better for overclocking. I realize the 2.26 might be a better overclockers, but I am considering the 2.4 for a slight overclocked system.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
2.53 is good. me personally, i would get the big dogg, 2.8Space Goat said:So I'm just curious, which cpu would you guys say is the best to get?
1.8A, 2.0A,2.26,2.4,2.53?
My roomate got a 2.26, with an P4B533-E and 512MB XMS 3200 C2. It tops at 17x168.
Edit: The retail 2.53 is only $233.00 at googlegear. I'm inclinded to order that.
i am calm, and i know you are not pointing fingers. we are all friends here so lets just fold.Burning Phoenix said:Calm down! I wasn't pointing the finger at you and trying to start a conflict. It seems this question has arisen many times and answered in a confusing way. I know if these chips had as good as a overcloking ability as it's slower grades it would clock well above 3.0. For example your 1.8 clocks 50% over with a initial fsb of 100. You know if it had a fsb of 133 to start it would never get to 2700mhz with a fsb of near 200.