-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
what chip is this?????????
- Thread starter AMD900
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2003
- Location
- Montevideo, Minnesota
475MHZ, I never had the board to clock it myself but my brother thought it was good.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
Yep its a 475, and it MIGHT hit 500, and it might not, the K6 series were really lousy overclockers and wouldn't go much higher than stock speeds, although there were good OCs, but prolly the people who got 'em were really lucky
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2002
- Location
- Minnesota
I've been having very good luck with overclocking the K6-2s. Not so much the K6s though. I have a K6-2 450 that goes to 500 no problem, and a 350 that does 450 with proper motivation.
- Joined
- May 19, 2003
- Location
- Hamden, CT
I currently have 2 K6-2 500Mhz chips both which run all day long at 550Mhz and 600Mhz repectfully. The 600 getts a lil flacky on occasion but if I back it down to 575Mhz its No Problemo.
Sink
Sink
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
Well I don't consider 10% - 15% OC a great OC but its an OC and its all good.
but I still think they weren't very good overclockers just because they wouldn't go much higher than the 500MHz mark, except the later K6-2s and then the K6-2+/3+s..
Also on a side note, Sinkhole I think your sig is just a bit too big, even with small text, we're allowed 13 lines (including empty lines) I counted like 22, you should look into making ur sig large horizontally and not vertically
but I still think they weren't very good overclockers just because they wouldn't go much higher than the 500MHz mark, except the later K6-2s and then the K6-2+/3+s..
Also on a side note, Sinkhole I think your sig is just a bit too big, even with small text, we're allowed 13 lines (including empty lines) I counted like 22, you should look into making ur sig large horizontally and not vertically
