Wow really? I never even knew that I must be lucky. all I did was open hwmontor to
Watch my temps while I was checking for stability like any other normal person would. Is there any chance the readings might be incorrect? I hope the answer is yes lol although I am almost certain it is not
I don't believe in that kind of luck -
there's an excellent chance you're looking at an incorrect reading!
I've never heard of
any program that can read the core temp on a CPU with unlocked cores. My bet is you're looking at garbage.
Could you go back to three cores, run Prime95, and let us know what both the CPU and core temp readings are at load running 3 cores? After that, unlock the extra core, run Prime95, and let us know what the CPU and core temps are at load with four cores. HWMonitor is usually fine for AMD's. If HWMonitor doesn't work right then other programs seldom work right either, except maybe Easy Tune (for Gigabyte boards) and it probably won't show the core temp.
Try RealTemp [snip] .. HWmonitor is a fussy program.. Some love it, some hate it.
I wouldn't trust RealTemp on an AMD platform
at all. They have ZERO experience with AMD and I, for one, will not be someone's guinea pig - especially when I'm overclocking. I need a program I can trust, one with years of reliable performance with AMDs like HWMonitor has. What few AMD systems HWMonitor doesn't work on require the manufacturer's monitoring program, (i.e., Probe II for ASUS boards), and not even CoreTemp works for those systems. Please keep your Intel bias to yourself when discussing AMD platforms.
BTW, I trust CoreTemp a lot. In fact, I prefer it once I've checked all the other readings on a new system with HWMonitor.
That's why I snipped out the parts of your post that referred to it.