920 @ 4.2ghz stock volts

[d94]

a picture is worth a thousand words

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=63343
and no reboots yet..

 

[wado1]

wow, just wow.....I have to upgrade now

 

[PWatterson]

Wow, man, that is amazing. Can't wait to see what that thing does with more voltage!

 

[RangerXLT8]

Pictures are all blurray, can't see anything but blurry smidges.. Can't wait to see your results.

 

[d94]

Pictures are all blurray, can't see anything but blurry smidges.. Can't wait to see your results.

you gotta click the pic to get the full size image
well..i wanted to keep goin on stock volts..but sen asked asked nicely
so i went ahead and did 1.45 @ 315fsb = 4.4ghz

no instability yet

 

[bazx]

Pictures are all blurray, can't see anything but blurry smidges.. Can't wait to see your results.

i think it says 3.2 no reboot yet


not bad at all

 

[wado1]

Is this air, water, phase or what?

 

[hyperasus]

Where did you buy this one d94?

 

[thegreek]

Where did you buy this one d94?

and what's the code/stepping on it?

 

[Alchemy1]

Wow, nice results! Hopefuly things will start to look up at time goes on for all the new 65nm chips. He is on water btw apogee:maze4:mag3:BIX2:2x sanyo denki.

 

[d94]

as alchemy1 pointed out im running water temps are starting to near that of my 830
chip is bought from mwave
had this puppy overnighted!
4.5ghz:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=63356

FPO/BATCH #: L541B400
pack date: 12/30/05

 

[Ross]

Nice results so far. Are these numbers benchable or just for the screen shots? You have the latest packing date so far and I wonder if that's making a difference. My 930 was 12/23 and so was Ranger's 920 IIRC. Batboy's 940 was 12/22.

If your numbers here are benchable and you can click off a 4.6-4.7 with 1.50Vc, the 920s are cheap enough that I might pick up one to play with on phase while waiting for the 661s to arrive

 

[d94]

well, no restarts
but i just ran 3dmark05 and it got through the first test, then 3dmark crashed lol
so i guess its not

btw..i cant go any higher unless i crank up the volts as windows wont boot, and 1.5 mite kill the chip from what i hear esp since windows is reading 3.49

should i burn in @ this speed and volts?

 

[xTrEmEoVrClOcKr]

1: Excellent results, cant wait until the steppings get better for the 930s / 940s .. might consiter picking one up. 2: Your load temps are only 30s!??!?!?!?! 3: Update your sig. Good chip bro.

 

[Ross]

I hear that....I wouldn't go over 1.50Vc either, but a lot of the hardcore OCs are on 1.55+Vc without issue so far. Nvpk (I think it was) issue was with a BIOS problem and not the proc. He got the "Checking BIOS...searching floppy....searching CD-ROM..." error on a bad OC and I dunno what happened after that. My 930 is more or less sold, otherwise I'd bite the bullet, reinstall phase, reinstall the vdroop mod and try a 1.55Vc myself.

Results look a little better than any other so far, but not enough for me to try another since it's not stable there. FYI, I was able to bench 4275 on WC last night @ 1.50Vc (1.52V idle->1.46V load w/o the droop mod). The droop really kills it because that could be a 1.45-1.46V actual setting with the mod. Good luck on getting further...

 

[d94]

heh..i ran a load proggi..it was doin 53C load..these temps are insanely HIGHLY
and then it restarted after being 100% load for a few min
so ill back down to 4.3 and see if its stable there!

update: im still @ 4.5
this time doing dual cpu burn in via cpu burn 1.01
load temp is 45c..dunno why its 8C lower, yet both cores are @ 100%
no restarts yet
ill burn in for a day and see if it becomes stable somehow

 

[hyperasus]

pcmark04?

 

[d94]

pcmark04?

havent run it yet

btw i just ran a half hour of CSS np

 

[hUMANbEATbOX]

very nice results. congrats!

 

[Ross]

pcmark04?

Yeah, 04 is really hard to get through. I've had procs OCed that pass all other benches except 04. If you can get through 04 clean, it's stable.