- Joined
- Apr 19, 2012
Software can report anything. Cpuz reads info from the cpu... it does not judge for itself what is or isnt a core. It looks at the micro code which tells it what it is.
The issue isnt with shared cache only either...instruction fetch, decode, floating point and l2 were all shared.
The McDonald's example is a but ridiculous trying to compare these situations. It's a DERP that coffee is hot....it isnt a DERP for an average consumer to be able to discern between a quad and octo core when the box says octo.
Well the story behind the coffee wasn't a derp. It was lack of advertisement on the lid and cup NOT indicating "caution hot" Or even just "hot" if my memory serves me today. So really it actually is a great comparison, instead of a lie, it was just without statement which turned out to be just as bad. THAT is how our court system works. It has nothing to do with what the product is...
Now it's just the same, I agree, I was simply stating how I viewed the processor, not debating it with or against AMD's Bull-Dog (for lack of ability to use better words) case they had to defend themselves on lol. It was solely just my opinion of the processor. But happy the case is over and hopefully lesson learned.
Did you know that I was able to slightly increase my score with Cinebench and have it run 16 threads instead of 8?? Was something I found interesting. Doesn't seem to do the same with Ryzen chips, but I haven't done as much CB with Ryzen either... Just something that I kinda noticed.