And about simple users using apple..forget that i did not mean it in that way...its kinda hard to explain in words...i just see it as apple is simpler than windows
I don't mean to get defensive.
I think Apple has come a long way with their systems. I think many people have a conception of Macs from school that still goes back to how they were with the Classic OS. IMO by the mid-late 90s Macs were worse then trash, OS 9 is one of the worst, most bloated, buggy, incredibly crash-prone operating systems I have ever used. It was so far technically behind the competition it was really quite sad. I'll make no bones about it, I have always
despised OS 9 from the getgo, and I always will. OS X is pretty good though. 10.5 has some bugs, but so did 10.4. I remember how 10.4 Server had a nasty bug with inheriting permissions that they didn't address until 10.4.2, and it was incredibly annoying for file serving duties. 10.5 has some issues here and there but for the most part I think it's pretty good, and they'll fix those issues in time, just as Microsoft will fix Vista's issues in time. Right now I can't use Vista because my sound pops and crackles and it drives me nutso! As beautiful an operating system as Vista is, and as nice as it is to use, the little technical glitches are too much, so I'm back on XP for now. I haven't really run into any technical issues with 10.5, other then the firewall issues that Cheator mentioned. Well, BOINC keeps crashing for me, but I think that is because of the optimized G4 client I've been trying to use. OS X Server is a very nice server operating system, the GUI-based administration tools make configuring Apache a walk in the park. I could administer everything manually via the conf files, but it's just so nice being able to point and click for everything (I imagine Windows Server is as easy). I can have other employees configure new users and security realms on the server without them needing to crawl through pages and pages of code in httpd.conf.
Other then overclocking, I think you can do anything on a Mac that you can do on a PC. Even with the Mac Pro and mac mini, it may be possible to overclock via pad-mods or pin-mods, although I've never seen anyone try (somebody please do and let me know how it works
). If a program isn't available for Mac, you can install Windows and it'll work fine. I'm typing this on a mac mini running XP right now, and I frequently use this mac mini to record SWF videos of web conferencing sessions with WildPresenter. It does a wonderful job at it, although admittedly I could've built a PC for a fraction of the price that would do the exact same thing just as well.
I do wish that Apple would release a headless mac (like the mini) that allowed for upgradeable video cards, that's my biggest beef with Macs in general. If you want to upgrade your video card you've got to buy a tower that costs at least $2K, and that sucks.
I kind of see OS X versus Windows as an automatic transmission versus a manual transmission. They'll both get you there, but one is easier to drive. Actually on second thought, that's not even a good analogy anymore. OS X lets you dive as deep into the operating system as Windows does, Vista actually seems more limiting then OS X is. Anyways sorry for my rambling post folks.