• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Chrome(Google) to add 13% overhead usage of ram. More hungry.

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

UltraTaco

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
https://www.forbes.com/sites/gordon...urity-upgrade-windows-mac-linux-chromeos/amp/

View attachment 200021

With over 60% market share, Chrome is the undisputed king of web browsers. A key factor behind this is Google’s commitment to keeping it seamlessly updated with essential fixes and optimisations, but now the company has admitted Chrome’s latest upgrade comes with an unavoidable nasty surprise…

‘Great Secret Features’ and ‘Nasty Surprises’ are my regular columns investigating the best features / biggest problems hidden behind the headlines.


Chrome’s new user interface is coming soon, but another problem has arrived firstGOOGLE

In a blog post, Google has admitted the newest version of Chrome rolling out to customers worldwide is going to consume up to 13% more of your system memory. For a browser whose biggest failing has long been its excessive memory consumption (1,2,3,4,5), this is the last thing users will want. Especially those with older systems and less RAM.

Google also confirmed this is a cross-platform change and will apply to Chrome on Windows, Mac, Linux, and Chrome OS. The last of these could be particularly impacted as Chrome OS systems often ship with only 4-8GB of RAM.

So why has Google done this?

It’s all in the name of security. The new, more bloated Chrome contains a feature called ‘Site Isolation’ which combats the serious Spectre vulnerability which exposes computers at a chip level.

“Site Isolation is a significant change to Chrome’s behavior under the hood, but it generally shouldn’t cause visible changes for most users or web developers (beyond a few known issues),” explains Chrome software engineer Charlie Reis in the blog point.

“It simply offers more protection between websites behind the scenes. Site Isolation does cause Chrome to create more renderer processes, which comes with performance tradeoffs: on the plus side, each renderer process is smaller, shorter-lived, and has less contention internally, but there is about a 10-13% total memory overhead in real workloads due to the larger number of processes.”


Site Isolation splits a single across multiple renderer processes to boost securityGOOGLE

Reis says his team “continues to work hard to optimize this behavior to keep Chrome both fast and secure” but for now everyone is just going to have to bite the bullet.

What’s more, if you are concerned about system performance, there’s nothing you can do to opt out. Reis says Site Isolation will be enabled for 99% of users across all platforms with just 1% held back as a test group.

What about mobile platforms? In a tweet, Google Chrome security specialist Justin Schuh says a version is being made for Android but has yet to be shipped due to “resource consumption issues.”

Ultimately, Google is right to do everything in its power to mitigate Spectre. It’s just unfortunate that the method chosen will impact the computers of users who are least likely to afford an upgrade…

- - - Updated - - -

Taco will soon be doomed with amount of ram it has.

View attachment 200022
 
Rather more ram usage instead of a security risk.
IMO With rigs these days 8-16GB standard its not an issue IMO.
Since Taco placed a phone screen shot in there, curious if they will make use of the code on phones as well... Speaking of which how old is that phone?!
 
Phone is old and they are working on Android version as well, but not impemented yet because of resource usage. It's in the article somewhere.

- - - Updated - - -

What about mobile platforms? In a tweet, Google Chrome security specialist Justin Schuh says a version is being made for Android but has yet to be shipped due to “resource consumption issues.”
 
this, along with the internet cache it uses, really makes it my go to browser!!!!!
scuse me, I seem to have gotten mary popins, paublo escobar and harry potter all mixed up here.
 
Last edited:
That's ironic, since that's the main reason I don't let Alphabet near most stuff. LOL I trust them almost as much as M$.

Firefox is Google by monetary policy. Vivaldi is Google by the Blink engine. And they've all got Chinese-written code because they take patches from around the world.

So, where's the browser you've written yourself from scratch?
 
Since Taco placed a phone screen shot in there, curious if they will make use of the code on phones as well... Speaking of which how old is that phone?!

Usage over the last month with a Galaxy S8+, average 1-2 open tabs, max 10 open tabs (mix of youtube and regular browsing) :

Screenshot_20180717-125832_Settings.jpg
 
Back