• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Help with my e6600

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Froz

Member
Joined
May 27, 2004
I finally have the CPU watercooling in place and I've been doing some serious testing on the overclocking front. Here's what i've learned so far:

I can definitly attest to the issue described here:
http://www.thetechrepository.com/showthread.php?t=30

9x398 vs 9x404
-Inter-Core Bandwidth MB/s: 10527 vs. 10290
-Inter-Core Latency ns: 45 vs. 54

-Dhrystone ALU MIPS: 33011 vs. 33478
-Whetstone iSSE3 MFLOPs: 22704 vs. 22366

-Memory Latency ns: 68 vs. 84
-Speed Factor (lower is better): 80.7 vs. 98.2

-INT Buff'd iSSE2 MB/s: 7311 vs 6828
-Float Buff'd iSSE2 MB/s: 7333 vs 6783

The above stats are based off of 4-4-4-12-4 timing ( trfc 20, trrd 10, rank write to read: 10, read to precharge delay 10, write to precharge delay 10). Temps are in the 45C range.

I can't seem to get above 404 stable voltage wise. More vcore or fsb, nb,sb etc doesn't seem to help. Even to hit 404, I've got to up the anty quite a bit. Perhaps I should relax my timings to push beyond 404 but lLooking at that chart though, I'd have to hit like 455 to equal out at 398? I definitly don't think this setup can do that x9.

Am I going about this rightway? Reading the post above, if I drop the multi down to 8, it's going to give me probs with the nbcc.

9x398 for 3582 is a pretty decent return on this investment but it seems like i should be able to go a bit farther.

TIA,
Froz
 
1.525, i should have mentioned that the 45C is load temp.
 
Back