If you have that 2666 C11 Team Xtreem then forget about it ... good only for max clocks.
2400 C10 and C9 Samsung based kits are probably easiest to tweak on new platforms. Also you can drop sub timings easier than on PSC. Generally 2400 C9 and C10 are overclocking the same just higher chance to make 2600+ C9 is on these C9 kits.
I was able to make better results on Samsungs than PSC. On the other hand I didn't spend much time playing with PSC on Z87 so maybe I can set something better.
About PSC. These IC were almost only in 2000 6-9-6-24, 7-9-7-24, 8-9-8-24, 9-9-9-24 ... Elpida BBSE was usually in 2000 9-9-9-27 , bdbg and hynix in 2000 9-11-9-27/28.
here is even one of my older BDBG tests :
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6787846#post6787846
2400 C10 and C9 Samsung based kits are probably easiest to tweak on new platforms. Also you can drop sub timings easier than on PSC. Generally 2400 C9 and C10 are overclocking the same just higher chance to make 2600+ C9 is on these C9 kits.
I was able to make better results on Samsungs than PSC. On the other hand I didn't spend much time playing with PSC on Z87 so maybe I can set something better.
About PSC. These IC were almost only in 2000 6-9-6-24, 7-9-7-24, 8-9-8-24, 9-9-9-24 ... Elpida BBSE was usually in 2000 9-9-9-27 , bdbg and hynix in 2000 9-11-9-27/28.
here is even one of my older BDBG tests :
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?p=6787846#post6787846