- Joined
- Dec 2, 2006
Ok so I'm working on a new system build and was planning on ordering Monday (Yesterday) but got delayed and am looking at ordering now.
I was going to order two sets of the OCZ Platinum (2 x 2GB) DDR2 1066 kits from newegg but they are out of stock on them now. I'd prefer to stick to ordering from newegg unless it is a very reputable alternative sight. I've always found newegg to be the best at getting my products to me timely and in the proper condition. I just can't decide what memory to order in place of this? I know Gskill is really popular and cheaper even, but I orderd some GSkill meory when it first started becoming popular and had nothing but problems out of it, so I'm not crazy about ordering that brand again.
I was also considering the OCZ Reaper kits, but I read some reviews that they don't overclock very well.
I'm going to be putting the memory in a P5E board with a Q9450 CPU which I plan to overclock.
Can anyone give some advice on some good memory to go with in this situation? I want at least 1066 mhz speed, but I'd go faster if it's not to much more expensive. Not looking to spend more than around 125 for 4Gbs and even thats pushing it, would prefer to stay closer to 100 per 4gbs (2 x 2gb). Oh and I will be running Vista 64bit just so no one mentions that I need to run 64 bit to use that much memory.
What kind of performance drop would I see if I went with the OCZ Platinum DDR2 1000? I'm really concerned with the memory speed bottlenecking the overall speed of the computer when I start overclocking the CPU. Keep in mind I'm not an expert on the speeds of everything so I could be completely wrong, but always assumed you wanted your memory FSB as close to your CPU FSB as possible.
Thanks!
EDIT:
Ok so I was just reading over at some forums about FSB Vs Memory speed and think I understand it a little better now. I just want to make sure this philosophy is consistent for quad core processors.
With the FSB being 1333 on the q9450, according to the other forums it's really a 333 FSB quad pumped (or transfers data 4 time per clock cycle).
And DDR2 is 2 times per cycle so 1000 mhz memory would really be equivalent to 500 mhz.
So if I'm reading this right, if I went with 1000 mhz memory even if I overclocked the q9450 to a 1600 FSB, DDR2 1000 would still perform fast enough to not bottle neck it correct?
My only question is since this is a quad core cpu, would the memory get hammered 4 times in the same cycle? Meaning to truely not be a bottle neck I'd need 3200mhz, 400mhz x 4 (for the 4 cores) x 2 (for the double rate on memory), memory which does not exist yet to my knowledge lol?
I was going to order two sets of the OCZ Platinum (2 x 2GB) DDR2 1066 kits from newegg but they are out of stock on them now. I'd prefer to stick to ordering from newegg unless it is a very reputable alternative sight. I've always found newegg to be the best at getting my products to me timely and in the proper condition. I just can't decide what memory to order in place of this? I know Gskill is really popular and cheaper even, but I orderd some GSkill meory when it first started becoming popular and had nothing but problems out of it, so I'm not crazy about ordering that brand again.
I was also considering the OCZ Reaper kits, but I read some reviews that they don't overclock very well.
I'm going to be putting the memory in a P5E board with a Q9450 CPU which I plan to overclock.
Can anyone give some advice on some good memory to go with in this situation? I want at least 1066 mhz speed, but I'd go faster if it's not to much more expensive. Not looking to spend more than around 125 for 4Gbs and even thats pushing it, would prefer to stay closer to 100 per 4gbs (2 x 2gb). Oh and I will be running Vista 64bit just so no one mentions that I need to run 64 bit to use that much memory.
What kind of performance drop would I see if I went with the OCZ Platinum DDR2 1000? I'm really concerned with the memory speed bottlenecking the overall speed of the computer when I start overclocking the CPU. Keep in mind I'm not an expert on the speeds of everything so I could be completely wrong, but always assumed you wanted your memory FSB as close to your CPU FSB as possible.
Thanks!
EDIT:
Ok so I was just reading over at some forums about FSB Vs Memory speed and think I understand it a little better now. I just want to make sure this philosophy is consistent for quad core processors.
With the FSB being 1333 on the q9450, according to the other forums it's really a 333 FSB quad pumped (or transfers data 4 time per clock cycle).
And DDR2 is 2 times per cycle so 1000 mhz memory would really be equivalent to 500 mhz.
So if I'm reading this right, if I went with 1000 mhz memory even if I overclocked the q9450 to a 1600 FSB, DDR2 1000 would still perform fast enough to not bottle neck it correct?
My only question is since this is a quad core cpu, would the memory get hammered 4 times in the same cycle? Meaning to truely not be a bottle neck I'd need 3200mhz, 400mhz x 4 (for the 4 cores) x 2 (for the double rate on memory), memory which does not exist yet to my knowledge lol?
Last edited: