I have a MSI Pro SLI Plus Z270 mobo and I am running my 7600k stable at 4.8 GHz. Running at 4.9 GHz requires a bit more voltage than I would like for 24/7 (about 1.37v vs 1.31 for 4.8 GHz). As such, I am thinking 4.85 GHz which would require a BLCK of around 101.1. Is it safe to mess with the BCLK? I've read conflicting stories and one overclocking guide on this website says that Kaby Lake CPUs can be ran to 170 BCLK which seems really high considering previous generation CPUs couldent handle more than 104.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-lake-overclocking-guide-with-statistics
"The higher you go from 100 base clock, the harder it is to stabilize. Generally the stability at 170 bclk and up will vary depending on the motherboard. You will sometimes fail to boot if the bclk is too high. There's usually no good reason to set the base clock above 170 though. With smart math, it should be possible to get very close to any frequency without exceeding 150 bclk."
Seriously, 170 BCLK? I cant see any reason to go over 103, because after that you can just use the multiplier to overclock... None the less, is this legit? Can the mobo really handle 150, because if it can then 101 is obviously perfectly fine.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1621347/kaby-lake-overclocking-guide-with-statistics
"The higher you go from 100 base clock, the harder it is to stabilize. Generally the stability at 170 bclk and up will vary depending on the motherboard. You will sometimes fail to boot if the bclk is too high. There's usually no good reason to set the base clock above 170 though. With smart math, it should be possible to get very close to any frequency without exceeding 150 bclk."
Seriously, 170 BCLK? I cant see any reason to go over 103, because after that you can just use the multiplier to overclock... None the less, is this legit? Can the mobo really handle 150, because if it can then 101 is obviously perfectly fine.
Last edited: