jenko said:
So basicly he says he fixed the problem removing the stock thermal pad and using decent thermal paste so why does he give the impression its the cpu`s fault.
I didnt bother reading it propelry cause it toms hardware.
Actually the jist of the article says how the stock heat sink and fan, and using the stock thermal pad is sufficient (sp ck) to operate the product as it was designed (3.6Ghz), but BARELY and with a case that doesn't exceed 38C.
Then they tackle the issue that any average machine builder would remove that heat sink and fan for a CPU upgrade, changing boards, etc. And in doing so, any normal person knows to you can't reuse the pad. SO they would use thermal paste. They find that using Thermal Paste, like any normal person, is a big no-no!
Then they tried an artict silver-like paste, and finally got results similar to the original pad.
In other words, they hit on two points: WHy is Intel releasing high-end products that only operate at their design specs under perfect conditions (lots of ventilation). And a tip for anyone with these processors and future processors: You can not use that tube of Thermal Paste you have had laying around all of these years. You have to start using a silver oxide type paste.
Me see Arctic Silver sales about to sky rocket, are they public?