Hi all,
I'm a bit of a newbie here so please excuse any howlers, I hope I'm at least in the right section to start with!?!
I'm currently researching an upgrade of Mobo/CPU/Ram/GFx.
I'm trying to keep the cost down, while trying to spend a reasonable amount on the Mobo to keep it stable & allow overclocking of a ~£65 CPU.
The Planned Upgrade is so far:
Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L, ToBeOCed Intel E5200, 2GB Ram (800MHz)
Already got: Seasonic 600W PSU & Antec P180 case, both bought to make it total silent (and futureproofed ready for this upgrade!)
I'll post separately in the relevant forum to check about the above planned bits, altho are there any major problems with GFx card/Mobo compatibility problems I should avoid?
My Old (current) Rig is:
P4 2.66GHz, 512MB Ram, Intel 865PE Mobo, and an
"OwnBrandEvesham" Radeon 9200 256MB [I think it says SE on it, which is probably the bogbasic one]
The Radeon's overclocked to 300/219 with AtiTool when running CS. [Res of the time runs at stock 200/166]
Worst case usage is Counterstrike:Source, which currently runs at ~30fps, somtimes dipping to a jerky 25, with lowish settings, run windowed at 1152x864.
I also use Gimp2 quite a lot, altho I would've thought the speed of that is determined more by CPU & Ram than GFx? Also sometimes video encoding muxing etc but again that's probably more CPU/Ram?
So my aim would be to have CS:S never jerky at 1280x1024. [Doesn't have to be 100% texture quality etc, just middle of the road quality's fine, as long as fps doesn't drop below ~35min]
I'm not likely to start gaming with any more recent games, I'm not a massive gamer, but do like to play CS every now and then.
There are some absolute bog-basic cards i've found such as:
£25 "OwnBrand" GF 8400 GS 256MB PCIe
Or others from the basic end shown in the following lists at:
Novatech / eBuyer / Dabs
[or elsewhere if they're trustworthy for Uk purchases]
What sort of speed would this give compared to my current setup? I know it's probably not going to be as good as one of the x600/x800 Geforces, but I'd rather just get a cheap one now which'll run CS:S reasonably well, then upgrade in the future if I start doing more gaming etc.
This would be more a switch to cater for the new PCIe mobo, and not really and upgrade as such.
Most threads I've found from tonight/this morning's hours of google trawling for budget card reccomendations are in the ~£50-£75 range minimum, and for much more intensive gaming. I'm looking the ~£25 or less, or really, however-cheap-i-can-get that will still run CS:S okay, and nothing newer or more intensive!
If this sounds like a completely crazy idea, and I should just stop being a sissy and spend more, please tell me! Will a better GFx card help considerably with stuff like Gimp and general running of the OS? I also wonder if even the absolute cheapo rubbish these days will be than my ancient Radeon??
BTW, I'll also be Definitely not upgrading to Vista so don't need much GFx for just desktop rendering with XP.
I'm completely lost in the GFx card world, it seems altogether more baffling than the CPU/Mobo lineup, especially with Ati vs NVidia, each with their generations, each with different ranges, each with different ram, each with different board makers etc etc etc....
Is the speed determined mainly by the chipset or is it largely affected by the rest (ram/manuf etc?)
Thanks very much for reading this far, any feedback would be greatly appreciated, even if it's just "get of our forums you noob"!
Thx, EJ
I'm a bit of a newbie here so please excuse any howlers, I hope I'm at least in the right section to start with!?!
I'm currently researching an upgrade of Mobo/CPU/Ram/GFx.
I'm trying to keep the cost down, while trying to spend a reasonable amount on the Mobo to keep it stable & allow overclocking of a ~£65 CPU.
The Planned Upgrade is so far:
Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L, ToBeOCed Intel E5200, 2GB Ram (800MHz)
Already got: Seasonic 600W PSU & Antec P180 case, both bought to make it total silent (and futureproofed ready for this upgrade!)
I'll post separately in the relevant forum to check about the above planned bits, altho are there any major problems with GFx card/Mobo compatibility problems I should avoid?
My Old (current) Rig is:
P4 2.66GHz, 512MB Ram, Intel 865PE Mobo, and an
"OwnBrandEvesham" Radeon 9200 256MB [I think it says SE on it, which is probably the bogbasic one]
The Radeon's overclocked to 300/219 with AtiTool when running CS. [Res of the time runs at stock 200/166]
Worst case usage is Counterstrike:Source, which currently runs at ~30fps, somtimes dipping to a jerky 25, with lowish settings, run windowed at 1152x864.
I also use Gimp2 quite a lot, altho I would've thought the speed of that is determined more by CPU & Ram than GFx? Also sometimes video encoding muxing etc but again that's probably more CPU/Ram?
So my aim would be to have CS:S never jerky at 1280x1024. [Doesn't have to be 100% texture quality etc, just middle of the road quality's fine, as long as fps doesn't drop below ~35min]
I'm not likely to start gaming with any more recent games, I'm not a massive gamer, but do like to play CS every now and then.
There are some absolute bog-basic cards i've found such as:
£25 "OwnBrand" GF 8400 GS 256MB PCIe
Or others from the basic end shown in the following lists at:
Novatech / eBuyer / Dabs
[or elsewhere if they're trustworthy for Uk purchases]
What sort of speed would this give compared to my current setup? I know it's probably not going to be as good as one of the x600/x800 Geforces, but I'd rather just get a cheap one now which'll run CS:S reasonably well, then upgrade in the future if I start doing more gaming etc.
This would be more a switch to cater for the new PCIe mobo, and not really and upgrade as such.
Most threads I've found from tonight/this morning's hours of google trawling for budget card reccomendations are in the ~£50-£75 range minimum, and for much more intensive gaming. I'm looking the ~£25 or less, or really, however-cheap-i-can-get that will still run CS:S okay, and nothing newer or more intensive!
If this sounds like a completely crazy idea, and I should just stop being a sissy and spend more, please tell me! Will a better GFx card help considerably with stuff like Gimp and general running of the OS? I also wonder if even the absolute cheapo rubbish these days will be than my ancient Radeon??
BTW, I'll also be Definitely not upgrading to Vista so don't need much GFx for just desktop rendering with XP.
I'm completely lost in the GFx card world, it seems altogether more baffling than the CPU/Mobo lineup, especially with Ati vs NVidia, each with their generations, each with different ranges, each with different ram, each with different board makers etc etc etc....
Is the speed determined mainly by the chipset or is it largely affected by the rest (ram/manuf etc?)
Thanks very much for reading this far, any feedback would be greatly appreciated, even if it's just "get of our forums you noob"!
Thx, EJ