Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
RedDawg41 said:
...
testing out on 133FSB to get a good feel for when I can get it up on the nforce2 board. this one is boots up stable @ 2200MHz (133x16.5) on vcore 1.525.... not bad at all.
treepop said:well on average I would say the 1800+'s are doing better....but that s obviously because their are like a gagillion more 1700+'s on this forum then 1800+'s......essentially the 1700+ and 1800+ are the same processor......(if stepping is the same of course).......the thing is you just gata get lucky to get yourself a good 1800+ or be near a fry's.....otherwise the guarunteed good stepping at excaliberpc.com is a great deal.......I can only take a stab at why the 1800+'s are doing so well.....and I would say that either they are newer and they did something diff with the chips at amd....or they have been proven at amd to be more stable hence the 1800+ rating instead of 1700+ which means they are proven more stable at ahigher speed....thus the 1800+'s are another weed out of great chips.....like the JIUHB is one weed out then the DLT3C is another way to tell it's a great chip....then 1800+ is like the best of the 1700+'s hence the next weed out of greater chips.....thus more people hitting 2.5gHz plus.....this is totaly a guess....I hope I was clear...I am watching someone play san fransico rush 2049 and they keep saying HEY HEY HEY HEY check this out check this out.....so it's kinda hard to focus on what I am typing
**EDIT** I know what the actual diff is between the 1700 and 1800 is I am just saying AMD may have found them more stable hence let them run at a higher speed...hence more overclockability.....if the post before was not clear
Obviously in any manufacturing process with variables in materials and processes you will get results such as yours. However on the balance of probabilities with a process that is becoming more mature, newer processors will on average perform better than older processors of the same type simply due to the AMD being further up the experience curve and having a better understanding of the entire process.james.miller said:RedDawg41 - my xp1800+ dlt3c is an 0312 - newer than my 0307 xp1700+ dlt3c.
that aint to shabby225x10.5
No not at all.....if 2.4 is the max your proc can do then thats the max....adding more voltage you might be able to hit higher....but 2.4 is still preaty great.......since 2.4 is your limit..but 200 isn't your limit on ram you lowered the multi.....which is what most people do......you can't up your overall mHz but it is possible to up your memory bandwith.......so ya did the right thingbut at lower clock speed i can run at higher fsb. is it just me?