- Joined
- Jun 14, 2004
I've seen people talking about taking legal action against Paypal for this and much less - but they never read the agreement that they "signed."
Yeah, there is a part of the agreement that the courts are moot.
The screwed part.... Arbitrators are more than likely going to side with the company that hires them. Something like 90% of the time. When you agree to the term of the contract, using the service. You waive some rights. Like being able to sue them outright. Get this, you cannot be there physically, during the arbitration..14.2 Arbitration. For any claim (excluding claims for injunctive or other equitable relief) where the total amount of the award sought is less than $10,000.00 USD, the party requesting relief may elect to resolve the dispute in a cost effective manner through binding non-appearance-based arbitration. If a party elects arbitration, that party will initiate such arbitration through an established alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider mutually agreed upon by the parties. The ADR provider and the parties must comply with the following rules: a) the arbitration shall be conducted by telephone, online and/or be solely based on written submissions, the specific manner shall be chosen by the party initiating the arbitration; b) the arbitration shall not involve any personal appearance by the parties or witnesses unless otherwise mutually agreed by the parties; and c) any judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction.
14.3 Law and Forum for Disputes. Except as otherwise agreed by the parties or as described in section 14.2 above, you agree that any claim or dispute you may have against PayPal must be resolved by a court located in either Santa Clara County, California, or Omaha, Nebraska. You agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the courts located within Santa Clara County, California, or Omaha, Nebraska for the purpose of litigating all such claims or disputes. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law provisions.
They are not a gank..err, I mean bank. So they do no have to adhere to banking rules. So the FTC is moot here. They are I think considered a broker.
One thing they cannot do. Is take more funds than you authorize them access to from the originating account. You give them a set amount of funds in a trust, that they manage on your behalf. They can only attempt collection activities past that. If your in the negative for your account..
If I am incorrect. Could you please show me law or a case precedent / rule that enlightens me otherwise. I do believe it would be not only screwed, but illegal. If they took funds from your bank account, without your giving explicit access to the funds.
Here is a horror story site:
http://www.paypalwarning.com/
It does have some good, but slanted information. It is a site about the bad of paypal.. Maybe you can garner some information and tips from there..
Last edited: