• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Should I get this...A64 combo

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Just get that to at least 2.2Ghz, which will be easy, and you'll be rockin.
 
didn't the 3000+ have less cache....from the newegg site it looked to have 512 cache instead of 1meg.....wouldn't that reault in less perfomance?......just curious:D........btu yeah man if it's the same as the a64 3200+ just -200 mhz then that system will rock your socks :D....shee even if it's a 64bit version of the 2500+ barton it will still rock your socks :)
 
if you have a 9800 XT with the 3000+ AMD64......you'll be rockin @ 23,000 3dmarks :) Note: must overclock everything
 
treepop said:
didn't the 3000+ have less cache....from the newegg site it looked to have 512 cache instead of 1meg.....wouldn't that reault in less perfomance?......just curious:D.

yes thats right but it still can kick a p4's arse at 2.4ghz when the p4 is at 4.2ghz :D
 
btu yeah man if it's the same as the a64 3200+ just -200 mhz then that system will rock your socks

Both the Xp3000+ & Xp3200+ AMD64 Run at 2ghz ..... only difference is the Xp3200+ has 1mb cache and the Xp3000+ has 512kb.

The Xp3000+ AMD64 is fantastic and is kicking ***. Not much of a difference between 1mb cache and 512kb from the benchmarks ive seen.
 
Back