Here's an example how much better a C2D is over a 3.2E

AudiMan · Jul 1, 2007

My 3.2E at stock speeds took just over 3 hours to encode a DVD through Nero 7, and my E4300 @ 3.1 (9X 346) only took 54 minues. :clap:

Nero 7 is a multithread-enabled application, so it did take advantage of the hyperthreading and dual cores. My Laptop has an A64 3400+ and it needed about 5 hours.

Roisen · Jul 2, 2007

This just in: fire is hot

Automata · Jul 2, 2007

Roisen said:
This just in: fire is hot

Uhh...ok...

Glad to hear it is better for you!!

||Console|| · Jul 2, 2007

AudiMan said:
My 3.2E at stock speeds took just over 3 hours to encode a DVD through Nero 7, and my E4300 @ 3.1 (9X 346) only took 54 minues.

Nero 7 is a multithread-enabled application, so it did take advantage of the hyperthreading and dual cores. My Laptop has an A64 3400+ and it needed about 5 hours.

keep bumping up your clocks and watch teh time go down =)

eternaljammer · Jul 2, 2007

||Console|| said:
keep bumping up your clocks and watch teh time go down =)

I always do that for fun. :thup:

tvdang7 · Jul 2, 2007

dude what dvd methods are you using to encode? when ever i copy a dvd it usually takes around and hour. you must be doing like super analysis or something.

Here's an example how much better a C2D is over a 3.2E

AudiMan

Member

Roisen

Member

Automata

Destroyer of Empires and Use

||Console||

Member

eternaljammer

Member

tvdang7

Member

Similar threads