- Joined
- Jun 6, 2002
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
not sure i get it but ok... i mean you cant deny the bad performance per clock of phenom vs core 2 arch. it took phenom II to catch up on a per clock basis. though we have to also keep in mind about the market segments. in server phenom wasnt so bad compared to intel. in gaming it was a bit different story.Ugh, what is with the bias articles lately? I prefer DAAMIT, but this BS going on lately is becoming very unacceptable. Repeating it on these forums is worse.
Why does the article have to start out with 2 completely subjective (and wrong) comments?
so its crap article to find out that your getting a PII X4 with a ATI 5000 series GPU on die in 2011? it will be far more advanced then what Intel has planned for CPU-GPU setup.yea crap article
By 2011 we'll have Sandy Bridge with an on-die not just on-package IGP, probably in Q4 2010. Now granted the IGP might be weak but the CPU ought to be kickass especially versus a Phenom II and it's not as if IGPs are all that powerful versus discrete cards anyway. No matter how good AMD and NVs IGPs are I don't see them having great utility in 3D apps just HD video acceleration.
I thought sandy bridge was basically a dual core neha with an IGP. I don't see how that wlll crush a phenom 2.
also don't forget that AMD lately has been known to deliver ahead of schedule.
I prefer DAAMIT...
I thought sandy bridge was basically a dual core neha with an IGP. I don't see how that wlll crush a phenom 2.
also don't forget that AMD lately has been known to deliver ahead of schedule.
Sorry Evil not poo pooing you. It seems like any article that favors DAAMIT lately, is sensational, and incredulous. As a DAAMIT fanboy, I do not like it.
I thought sandy bridge was basically a dual core neha with an IGP. I don't see how that wlll crush a phenom 2.
also don't forget that AMD lately has been known to deliver ahead of schedule.
It's not that Phenom II is a bad architecture it's that by the time this rumor says it will be released it will be pretty well outdated. AMD needs to do Bulldozer with on-die IGP at that point not Phenom II with on package IGP.
Explain to me why you need an 8" cubed desktop? Please? Anybody?
Rana and Heka were and are again delayed too. AMDs conference call suggests that was because of large inventory pileup - due to the hugely slowed spending they claim - of unsold 65nm parts until Q3, such that, nearly all of what they sold in Q1/Q2 was 65nm.Propus, Rega, Callisto was late, the mobile platform as well.
Do you know that an average PC drawing 200W in windows at 12V is drawing about the same out of the wall as a fairly dim lightbulb?
so its crap article to find out that your getting a PII X4 with a ATI 5000 series GPU on die in 2011? it will be far more advanced then what Intel has planned for CPU-GPU setup.