alright, different angle today.
want to address the issue why AMD cards are inferior to the ATI era.
first, take a look at the companies performance:
early on, AMD did have the edge over NVDA, however, since 2007, AMD has lost on BOTH CPU chip (to Intel) and GPU (to NVDA), market share of both has been on a steady decline, meaning less people buying their things, and as such, AMD is earning less money. in fact just in June, they revised their earnings even lower, and was one of the worst performing tech.
NOW, that explains A LOT.
- from terrible drivers, to terrible customer service.
and the outlook remains, unless AMD comes up with something innovative, their company will eventually lose out, and for now you can expect them to release only crappier products as the cost to produce will be limited for sure.
want to address the issue why AMD cards are inferior to the ATI era.
first, take a look at the companies performance:
early on, AMD did have the edge over NVDA, however, since 2007, AMD has lost on BOTH CPU chip (to Intel) and GPU (to NVDA), market share of both has been on a steady decline, meaning less people buying their things, and as such, AMD is earning less money. in fact just in June, they revised their earnings even lower, and was one of the worst performing tech.
NOW, that explains A LOT.
- from terrible drivers, to terrible customer service.
and the outlook remains, unless AMD comes up with something innovative, their company will eventually lose out, and for now you can expect them to release only crappier products as the cost to produce will be limited for sure.