- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Location
- San Diego, CA
Actually they're still below the norm
I have an e2140 @ 3.2Ghz and a 8600GT. I get over 5000 even with the 8600 at stock, and just below 5900 with it overclocked.
Your Quad should trounce my CPU even at the higher clock in the CPU section, so it still seems a bit low in all honesty.
I'm not positive, but 3dmark may not utilize the quad core much, if at all. If that's the case and it doesn't utilize over 1M of cache, then that would explain the similar 3dmark06 scores assuming the bottleneck lies in the GPU and not the CPU.
I'm not saying that the 8600 GT is or will ever be better than any 8800 series card. I was just saying that for under $100, it does offer some pretty good performance. If it does what the OP needs it to do, then spending $260+ on another card that won't do what he does any better would be a waste of money. On my laptop, I really only run IE and Office apps and it has integrated graphics. I didn't get the 7900 or any other dedicated graphics because it would have added extra cost and performance (not to mention reduced battery life, more heat, and extra weight) that I would have never really used.