I had a hard time googling this. So here we go.
I was not particularly happy with Planetside 2's CPU bottleneck on my Phenom II X6 in large firefights(hundreds of players at once) so I started trying a few different things. I disabled 3 cores and then 4 cores and did not experience a change in frame rate. As long as it had multiple cores 1 core would be at roughly 75% all of the time and PS2 would spread/combine other threads on the remaining cores. So I asked on their forums and somebody brought up that DX9 only uses a single core to deal with data for the graphics card.
So is this the truth? I find it hard to believe that a company would use dx9 to appeal to something like 20% of the market when that 20% likely doesn't have the hardware to deal with the game in the first place. Of course, it is Sony.
I was not particularly happy with Planetside 2's CPU bottleneck on my Phenom II X6 in large firefights(hundreds of players at once) so I started trying a few different things. I disabled 3 cores and then 4 cores and did not experience a change in frame rate. As long as it had multiple cores 1 core would be at roughly 75% all of the time and PS2 would spread/combine other threads on the remaining cores. So I asked on their forums and somebody brought up that DX9 only uses a single core to deal with data for the graphics card.
So is this the truth? I find it hard to believe that a company would use dx9 to appeal to something like 20% of the market when that 20% likely doesn't have the hardware to deal with the game in the first place. Of course, it is Sony.