Four DDR5 DIMM stable settings and performance results (not questions)

[kc16]

This thread is not for questions. Please share your four DIMM DDR5 settings that are stable and the performance information associated with your four DIMM settings.

Please don't post unless you have identified stable settings and can provide the settings and performance information.

I've run many hours of stress tests (MemTest86 and Aida64) using these settings. This computer will be used with programs that use all of the available threads and memory.

Two G.SKILL Trident Z5 Neo 64GB (2 x 32GB) F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5N provide the 128GB.

 

[Woomack]

Somehow I doubt you will find many users who have 4 DIMM DDR5, as it's usually just pointless. Even less would care to run long stability tests and post them on the forums. Most feel like 64GB is a waste of money.

Today I should finish my new ITX PC and will run longer stability tests. Even if I wanted, I think I sold all 4-slot DDR5 mobos that I had. I literally have 4x ITX, 1x mATX, and 1 ATX with 2 memory slots right now.

 

[TerranBrackiatt]

with all the 2x16GB kits out there this generation (compared to DDR4), it's much more common for 2 slot setups for 32GB systems. the only reason i can think of for the average user to have more RAM is to use in RAMcache mode (using RAM to store the entire game for faster load times), but that requires extra software built into the motherboard. I know Asus has it, but i don't think i'll spend that much money to max out my RAM, considering NVMe tech. i really don't know how they compare. i haven't even looked for reviews because it's not generally a main story on tech sites.

 

[Woomack]

with all the 2x16GB kits out there this generation (compared to DDR4), it's much more common for 2 slot setups for 32GB systems. the only reason i can think of for the average user to have more RAM is to use in RAMcache mode (using RAM to store the entire game for faster load times), but that requires extra software built into the motherboard. I know Asus has it, but i don't think i'll spend that much money to max out my RAM, considering NVMe tech. i really don't know how they compare. i haven't even looked for reviews because it's not generally a main story on tech sites.

I was testing the DDR4 RAM disk (128GB/4000+CL16, as I remember), and it didn't really help in loading times. If there was a difference, then so insignificant that I haven't seen it. Current SSDs are already fast enough. I guess that RAM disk was a thing when HDDs were popular.

 

[kc16]

First a reminder: This discussion's title is "Four DDR5 DIMM stable settings and performance results (not questions)"

I updated to ASRock X670E Taichi BIOS 1.18.AS03 and made some minor timing changes. For me, the biggest benefit associated with this BIOS update is reduced boot time. I've attached updated information. My four DDR5 DIMM setup is for processing large amounts of information and makes use of all 128GB of memory and all processor cores. Correct results are more important than faster but incorrect results.