Myself and I
Disabled
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2001
- Location
- Savannah ,GA
Which is better geforce4 mx420 64meg of geforce 3 ti 200 running at 200/475?
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
takiwa said:any of the GF3's are faster than a GF4 MX...it's just an overbaked GF2
VERY cool...more competition would benefit us allwouldnt it be cool if 3dfx was still around
takiwa said:VERY cool...more competition would benefit us all
Maxvla said:
hopefully matrox will get their end figured out so we can have 3 companies going at it full scale.
nuclear video card war = low cost high fps video cards
Penguin4x4 said:
Matrox's Parhelia is slow because they packed too many transistors into the core.
wilhelm310 said:yeah fbs is everything but what about look's? lol