I just got done playing BF3 for a bit and with my 670SC 4GB i was getting 80 - 140 or so fps on ultra. I love this card! It was a nice step up from my (now my dads) 560SC 2GB. Currently I only have 1 BenQ XL2420T, but am saving for 2 more!
So, unless you are playing in 3D or especially on large screens or multi -display setups, you dont really need a 4 GB card, right? Also, does anyone have any idea how multi monitor setup(3 way) can affect your fps rates.
Yeah that is why I got a 670SC 4GB, Nvidia surround! I can try to upload a Heaven benchmark for it when it was at stock clocks.
Sorry had to compress it, it was to big a file.
So, unless you are playing in 3D or especially on large screens or multi -display setups, you dont really need a 4 GB card, right? Also, does anyone have any idea how multi monitor setup(3 way) can affect your fps rates.
I don't think so.....if your playn on 1920 x 1080 ,2 gb will be fine....how ever if in the future your plains are to run two or more monitors,or get an 2560 x 1440 ...then get the 4 gb....IMO ....
cwinot-- I dont have much experience using Unigine, but I bet thats a hell of a score you posted above.
Kalibur -- Yes, that was what I was also saying in my post above, that you really dont need anything more than 2 gb if you are not using more than one screen. But I think for now, even with VRAM hungery games like BF3, 2 GB is quite enough if you play on 1080p or a little more with a single monitor. But for future -proofing, yeah, I do think a 4Gb is quite good, but I personally dont feel the price difference is worth it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.