- Thread Starter
- #41
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
It expands here fine currently, possibly something amiss with wingman's setup?I'll fix it better when I am on pc
With your rig you have a top score, nobody even comes close, except a i5 6600k. I turned off speed step and it seems to be consistent, for sure i5 2500K scores higher with speed step off IE 11, I did five runs, 17153,17075,17059,17195,17010, speed step on 16791,16820,16879.
I do agree about the kernel anomaly.Just spent a little time with Octane 2.0, looking mainly for the effect of SpeedStep.
18899 18880 18675 18770 18820 18860 SS on, so 1.6-3.3GHZ, Turbo 3.7.
16986 18568 18846 18864 18981 18835 SS off, so 3.3GHZ, Turbo 3.7.
18787 18458 18872 Security off, SS on.
18944 18907 19053 Security off, SS off.
W7x64 (fresh install 8 days ago), E3-1230v2 stock, Pale Moon x64 (current, private Beta).
All in the same Windows session, from 10~50 minutes uptime. SpeedStep on/off changed on the fly. New browser profile, cleaned after each run.
The major anomaly, run#1 line 2, is probably down to Kernel/high Priority activity from some Windows 'hidden' start up process/Task, it was the second run, ~15 minutes uptime. Some minor anomalies are probably also down to background/Kernel processes, most but not all runs had 2-3 small Kernel spikes showing in TaskMan.
Many of you will have SpeedStep lower than is possible on my Xeon, maybe as low as 600-800GHz, that extra drop/latency will likely show up more than in my tests.