OP
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2001
- Thread Starter
- #41
OK, here's the deal....., got another card, jammed it in, fdisked & reformatted again (just to play it safe) installed win ME again..(i know..i know....but my XP cd still hasn't made its way to me.)
Installed beta drivers, newest ones, set AGP ratio to 1:1 ( takes care of the agp 4x issue about speed....100 Mhz FSB makes for 200 Mhz AGP @ 2x....still below its max..with a 2:3 ratio makes for 264 Mhz AGP @ 4x( so my 2x is close to 4x speed)...so its not stressin....yet...we'll see what happens when i bring the FSB back up to 133...heh heh)
loaded JUST 3dmark 2001...nothing else except windows and 3dmark installed..ran default test and scored a modest 5601.
Image quality still has a problem, but not anywhere near as bad as it was. now i'm trying to figure out...why this card looks a little better visually..but gets a lower score than the other one? ( 7000 in 3dM 2k1) as everything is set exactly the same.....and yes, its a real retail again....fresh outa the nice big shrinkwrapped red box! (275/275...weird thing tho...the ram is marked with -33 instead of -36 like the last one...)
Anyway, i guess i'll settle for this thing and see what future drivers do to make it better, but, i'll think twice next time I go out to buy the latest and greatest.
PS..the latency on the card should be between 64-128 so i been told, so it seems there was a prob with the last one...i gotta install sandra again, ( can't get the update from them...site is down? i dunno...) until then, i have no clue what the latency is on this one......
Installed beta drivers, newest ones, set AGP ratio to 1:1 ( takes care of the agp 4x issue about speed....100 Mhz FSB makes for 200 Mhz AGP @ 2x....still below its max..with a 2:3 ratio makes for 264 Mhz AGP @ 4x( so my 2x is close to 4x speed)...so its not stressin....yet...we'll see what happens when i bring the FSB back up to 133...heh heh)
loaded JUST 3dmark 2001...nothing else except windows and 3dmark installed..ran default test and scored a modest 5601.
Image quality still has a problem, but not anywhere near as bad as it was. now i'm trying to figure out...why this card looks a little better visually..but gets a lower score than the other one? ( 7000 in 3dM 2k1) as everything is set exactly the same.....and yes, its a real retail again....fresh outa the nice big shrinkwrapped red box! (275/275...weird thing tho...the ram is marked with -33 instead of -36 like the last one...)
Anyway, i guess i'll settle for this thing and see what future drivers do to make it better, but, i'll think twice next time I go out to buy the latest and greatest.
PS..the latency on the card should be between 64-128 so i been told, so it seems there was a prob with the last one...i gotta install sandra again, ( can't get the update from them...site is down? i dunno...) until then, i have no clue what the latency is on this one......