- Joined
- Apr 23, 2001
I totally agree I am a system admin for a leading hosting provider which does managed, cloud, clustering, co-lo services and I moved from working on Windows to a Linux system admin.I have to disagree here. I prefer to work on interesting projects in a nice environment with less pay and no possibility for certification then on something boring or in a bad environment.
Think 10 years down the line.
edit:
I would also like to add, that I can't believe somebody is contemplating between Microsoft and Cisco certs and what jobs they will get you. The carrier paths are very different, the jobs you would work are very different. It's not quite like contemplating between a redhat or microsoft certification.
The reason for this was not money, my carrear could be far more advanced if I had stayed on windows however clicking the mouse for the rest of my life did not interest me anymore in the slightest.
Im now a Linux sys admin and its a role which interests me grealtly and allows me to learn everyday.
dropadrop said:I think networking is very interesting. There is however a risk of landing in a place that has a very narrow scope. Big enterprises tend to "departmentize" things quite efficiently, and if you are unlucky you'll end up in a team that just opens and closes switch ports all day long. However if you are lucky you will end up planning network architectures which is IMO more interesting then maintaining Windows servers (especially after the novelty runs out).
As you correctly state networking is really really cool if you get into the right area however the reality for most networking guys on a day to day basis is opening firewall ports, creating DNS zone files and configuring load balancers.
Not all networking guys work on backbone engineering and design datacentre networks.
PS : - The novelty of maintaining window enviroments runs out fast imho, Ive never met someone who admins Window boxes who is passionate about doing the task, Linux guys and Cisco guys love what they do.