• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Nvidia "Kepler" series launching in Q1 2012!

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

zitnik

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2011
Location
Michigan
http://fudzilla.com/graphics/item/23282-kepler-28nm-to-launch-in-q1-2012

"We got word that Kepler, Nvidia's successor to Fermi architecture and its first 28nm part won’t launch until Q1 2012.

Our sources from the Far East are telling us that it’s the maturity of the 28nm process is to blame and that the chip could theoretically make it to very late Q4 2011 launch, but sources close to company are telling them that it would not make much sense to launch it that late in the quarter.


ATI is still on schedule to launch its 28nm chip in 2011, other sources are telling us, and ATI’s chip will be affected by the same issues, mainly the poor yields of the 28nm process. Even if ATI launches in 2011, very late Q3 or first half of Q4 2011 were the dates that we’ve heard, the chip wont really be massively available until some point in 2012.

Transitioning to a new process in the graphics word is always painful, and it took TSMC a lot to go from 65nm to 40nm and now, they are again faced with a difficult transition to 28nm and bad yields for quarters to come.
"


Looks like we'll be waiting a while for the new GPUs. Kind of disappointed, I was hoping for a Q4 launch and getting a new GPU for BF3. ATI/AMD is still on schedule for a fall release and is expected to have their new cards out in September.
 
Id rather them delay the release when there getting better yields though. i mean correct me if im wrong but isn't the performance of the card and overclocking potential all up to the yields they get?
 
I think waiting is key also. Yeah I would have to agree that higher yields would allow for better gpus overall. The binning process would then net nice top end cards for us crazy OC'ers.
 
Id rather them delay the release when there getting better yields though. i mean correct me if im wrong but isn't the performance of the card and overclocking potential all up to the yields they get?

Higher yield means that they have to scrap less chips off of the line due to manufacturing faults. Having a higher yield will likely result in a more stable product as well as lower cost (due to having to scrap less product).
 
Great info, thanks. I just wish these new cards would be out for bf3 also :bang head . Now I need to find a card to hold me by before then, and run bf3 good.
 
Important to remember what "fud" stands for. fudzilla is remarkably honest about it (it's in their name!), especially compared to good old charlie.

That doesn't mean they're wrong, just that some NaCL needs to be included.
 
I really would love for them to come out, I figured before they'd be out in or around the time BF3 comes out, kind of how Nvidia released the 8800GT right around the time Crysis came out and then for Crysis 2 they released the 560 Ti.

AMD will have their new cards out around then. I'd happily get an AMD/ATI, but I like Nvidia's added features of CUDA and PhysX and that's usually the difference in determining cards for me. Usually I just go with who is better at the time, since they both trade blows and one will occasionally make better cards for a few series than the other and then the other will get ahead.
 
Back