• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

[OFFICIAL] Free ICD7 thermal compound for OCF members Results Thread

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
Pressure mount testing with TRUE:

Ambient = Constant 21C


TRUE not lapped:

1.272V idle
380x9
41/39C idle

---

1.220V load
380x9
58/58C load


==============


TRUE lapped (TRY 2 NUMBERS, #1 I did not test):

1.272V idle
380x9
36/34C idle

---

1.220V load
380x9
54/54C load

PICTURE (CLOSE)
NoLAPCropClose.jpg
.
.
PICTURE (FAR WITH FLASH)
NoLAPCrop.jpg
.
.
SCAN (NO LAP, alone)
NoLapE7200TRUE.jpg
.
.
PICTURE (FAR)
SheetListCropsize.jpg
.
.
SCAN (NO LAP)
img485.jpg
.
.
SCAN (LAP TRY 1)
img486.jpg
.
.
SCAN (LAP TRY 2)
img487.jpg


It doesn't look like temps should of dropped, but they did...
Hopefully you can shed some insight?
 
That 24 Carat tube looks attractive but the shipping has gotten obscene since the shippers have passed on their increased fuel costs :mad:

Heck if they shipped you a $5 bill, it would cost you $12 LOL.

I'll order some soon so I can use it before the summer heat kicks in.
 
Pressure mount testing with TRUE:

Ambient = Constant 21C


TRUE not lapped:

1.272V idle
380x9
41/39C idle

---

1.220V load
380x9
58/58C load


==============


TRUE lapped (TRY 2 NUMBERS, #1 I did not test):

1.272V idle
380x9
36/34C idle

---

1.220V load
380x9
54/54C load



It doesn't look like temps should of dropped, but they did...
Hopefully you can shed some insight?


Looks like you have one of the highest pressures to date, hard to tell from the pictures, have to wait for the analysis.

With good pressure you may gain a degree or so 40lbs-80lbs. With changes in the contact area + good pressure you can swing several deg. obviously.

First pic the pressure/contact looks biased lower right with about 1/2 the IHS with lighter pressure. which can give a higher temp. Not knowing how the cores are oriented to the pressure imprint you could be light on one of the cores or possibly one side of both.

On the second one you look light in the center with the load on the top and bottom edges.

The third pic look like an almost perfect distribution on load combined with a good pressure reading.

The one thing the film does not tell you is the depth on the "white" areas. You could be .001 or one mile the only indicator being a well defined contact area.

The paste resolves to about .001 thick in the contact areas so if you have a low spot .001-.002 The paste in those low areas would be .002-.003 thick which would affect performance in those Low spots.

Down at these .001 levels details become magnified - if your hardware is off a few thousands on one side will probably bias loads. Another thought I had was the IHS is still sheet metal and with 50-60lbs does it flex or ripple a few thousandths under load? On some of the results I have seen 90+ lbs on some spots. Maybe you will still get a variance between two good lap jobs with different flex/hardware? I do not know just speculating.

I was thinking that a poor man's test could be something like this. Lightly oil/wax? you sink base and then apply some 5min epoxy to the IHS, clamp toghether, Let harden and then separate. The sink should lift off with no problem and what sticks to your IHS would be your low spots which could then be lapped until there is no more epoxy, at which point you would know you are flat.

You could then reverse the process for the sink. I am not entirely sure about it I am still thinking that it through, maybe superglue? Elmer's glue?some kind of liquid plastic?
 
All pieces are oriented so that the arrow of the CPU is facing bottom left, which means the core is in the middle as a tall rectangle.

TRUE was looser after lapping, I think it took quite a bit of material off after the 2nd lap.

Should I send in all 3? Or just pre and lap #2?

Thanks for the informative post :)
 
You can't scan to see how much better my lapping got?

;)

I'll send them out Tuesday.
 
Does not mean much unless I have the temp test data to match/correlate to the contact data, otherwise just a pretty picture
 
Does not mean much unless I have the temp test data to match/correlate to the contact data, otherwise just a pretty picture

I mean the average pressure and other data of the print so I can find out how much better I did compared to the second time I lapped.
(Plus that nifty 3D graph)

Temp data you will obviously use First and Third pieces.
 
8b

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 8b1&2.JPG
    8b1&2.JPG
    136.7 KB · Views: 348
19b

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 19b1&2.JPG
    19b1&2.JPG
    138 KB · Views: 344
20b3

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 20 b3 1&2.JPG
    20 b3 1&2.JPG
    137.4 KB · Views: 340
20a

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 20A1&2.JPG
    20A1&2.JPG
    131.5 KB · Views: 344
20b1

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 20b21&2.JPG
    20b21&2.JPG
    138.3 KB · Views: 332
20b4

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 20b41&2.JPG
    20b41&2.JPG
    134.4 KB · Views: 334
20b2

Note: to edit/add thermal data later
 

Attachments

  • 20B_21&2.JPG
    20B_21&2.JPG
    138.7 KB · Views: 332
Back