- Joined
- Dec 27, 2008
Had to order this out of Canada as it's not available in the US yet. Some kind of patent dispute going on I think.
Radiator is 3x120mm fans long so more surface area than the next best AIO products on the US market that have 2x140 mm fans.
Out of the box the first thing that hits you is how much larger the hoses are than on other AIO coolers.
The copper heat plate on the pump has a mirror finish.
One major difference from the several other AIO coolers I've used is that the Swiftech fans mount on top of the radiator instead of on the underneath. So the fans are sandwiched between the radiator and the case top panel. They come mounted this way from the factory.
The fans draw fresh cool air in from the outside and push the warmed air down through the radiator into the case. The end of the radiator opposite the hose inlet/outlet end has a fill port and is thicker than the radiator itself. This creates kind of an "L" shape on that end. So the radiator on that side is not flat but the step created by this offset is shorter than the thickness of the fans. So it does not interfere with mounting of the radiator to the underside of the case panel as long as the fans are attached to that side of the radiator. However, this design might inhibit moving the fans on the other side of the radiator so as to push the warmed air out of the case up though the top panel, the more conventional arrangement and it also suggests reversing the direction of other case fans to complement the direction of flow instead of opposing it. I also wonder if this "step" in the tank is designed to afford a place for air bubbles to go. Swiftech has designed this unit to allow draining, flushing and refilling. According to the manual the original coolant has anti-corrosion additives and is good "for up to three years" before needing to be changed. Radiator is 29mm thick but I don't have a fin density count.
The pump is barely audible at full speed and is PWM controlled.
The PWM fans are audible at full speed but not loud. The emphasis is on "quiet" as their CFM rating is very modest at 55c. The static pressure is rated at 2.29 mmH2O. I'm sure performance would benefit from stronger fans.
One impressive (but also problematic) design feature of this unit is the mounting mechanism. Unlike all the other AIO coolers I've tried, the mounting hardware for this product creates very strong pressure for good contact with the CPU. My only complaint is that it's difficult to get the pressure bracket screws lined up with the threaded base plate holes when you are fighting the sideways push of the hoses while trying to clear the obstacles in the area such as the VRM heat sinks. This makes it likely that your TIM contact pattern will get disrupted so as to give a less than optimum mount. I redid the original mount with the help of my wife. A flashlight and an extra set of hands helped and the redone mount improved my load temps by about 2c.
But now the most important part: performance. With my 2600k overclocked to 4.6 ghz the Swiftech gave me about 5c lower load temps than the Noctua NH D14 it replaced. Idle temps were 2-3c lower. Meh. But under higher wattage situations the Switech really came into it's own. With the overclock cranked up to 4.8 ghz and with considerably higher core voltages needed to stabilize that level of overclock, the Swiftech gave me load temps about 14c lower than the Noctua (from mid 80s c to 70c). This was a vivid illustration of how much more reserve cooling capacity you can get when moving up to a bigger cooler. It may not seem like much improvement until you really ratchet up the watts.
Radiator is 3x120mm fans long so more surface area than the next best AIO products on the US market that have 2x140 mm fans.
Out of the box the first thing that hits you is how much larger the hoses are than on other AIO coolers.
The copper heat plate on the pump has a mirror finish.
One major difference from the several other AIO coolers I've used is that the Swiftech fans mount on top of the radiator instead of on the underneath. So the fans are sandwiched between the radiator and the case top panel. They come mounted this way from the factory.
The fans draw fresh cool air in from the outside and push the warmed air down through the radiator into the case. The end of the radiator opposite the hose inlet/outlet end has a fill port and is thicker than the radiator itself. This creates kind of an "L" shape on that end. So the radiator on that side is not flat but the step created by this offset is shorter than the thickness of the fans. So it does not interfere with mounting of the radiator to the underside of the case panel as long as the fans are attached to that side of the radiator. However, this design might inhibit moving the fans on the other side of the radiator so as to push the warmed air out of the case up though the top panel, the more conventional arrangement and it also suggests reversing the direction of other case fans to complement the direction of flow instead of opposing it. I also wonder if this "step" in the tank is designed to afford a place for air bubbles to go. Swiftech has designed this unit to allow draining, flushing and refilling. According to the manual the original coolant has anti-corrosion additives and is good "for up to three years" before needing to be changed. Radiator is 29mm thick but I don't have a fin density count.
The pump is barely audible at full speed and is PWM controlled.
The PWM fans are audible at full speed but not loud. The emphasis is on "quiet" as their CFM rating is very modest at 55c. The static pressure is rated at 2.29 mmH2O. I'm sure performance would benefit from stronger fans.
One impressive (but also problematic) design feature of this unit is the mounting mechanism. Unlike all the other AIO coolers I've tried, the mounting hardware for this product creates very strong pressure for good contact with the CPU. My only complaint is that it's difficult to get the pressure bracket screws lined up with the threaded base plate holes when you are fighting the sideways push of the hoses while trying to clear the obstacles in the area such as the VRM heat sinks. This makes it likely that your TIM contact pattern will get disrupted so as to give a less than optimum mount. I redid the original mount with the help of my wife. A flashlight and an extra set of hands helped and the redone mount improved my load temps by about 2c.
But now the most important part: performance. With my 2600k overclocked to 4.6 ghz the Swiftech gave me about 5c lower load temps than the Noctua NH D14 it replaced. Idle temps were 2-3c lower. Meh. But under higher wattage situations the Switech really came into it's own. With the overclock cranked up to 4.8 ghz and with considerably higher core voltages needed to stabilize that level of overclock, the Swiftech gave me load temps about 14c lower than the Noctua (from mid 80s c to 70c). This was a vivid illustration of how much more reserve cooling capacity you can get when moving up to a bigger cooler. It may not seem like much improvement until you really ratchet up the watts.
Last edited: