well, a 1.6 m is supposed to be in the neighborhood of a 2.6pIV. I would guess the 1.6 celly m is around a 2.6 celly. No match for a 3.0 PIV or a Sempron 3000+. If it's deciding a laptop buy you might be able to pick up a 1.6 400fsb pentium m to replace that celly. If it's a 915 chipset then you can do the pin mod to make the 1.6 m a 2.13 533fsb chip. Now that would be a match for a 3.0 PIV .
actually going from a pentium-m to a celeron-m only has a difference of 1 MB cache... which is like going from a dothan to bianas chip w/less speedstep features. So thus...
Celerons M's are more poweful than celeron d's MORESO THAN EVEN pentium-m's are to p4's
those numbers might be alittle biased against the celeron D but I assure you it is only because of my attatude toward this processor which to say the least involved pain and suffering...
I have never actually had a prescott celeron and I plan to never own one... it is totally based off of the willimatte and northy celerons but the celeron D should follow similar performance to it's older versions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.