Grov said:
Do you guys thinks id notice a difference if i got a raptor?
I currently just use a 80gig and 160gig WD IDE's, the 80gig of which is 2mb cache.
It's hard to tell if you would notice. No offence, but a huge number of users simply don't know what they are looking at. It's really hard to tell which type a particular person is.
My recent boot drive setups have been 2x80GB SATA HGST 7k250s on the ICH5-R in RAID0, a single 160GB PATA 7k250, and currently a Raptor 74. The differences are pretty subtle, but they are cetrainly there.
Both RAID0 and non-native SATA (which is what Raptors and 7k250s are) degrade latency slightly. The 7k250 has the best seek performance of the 7200rpm drives. The net result was moving from my PATA 7k250 to the Raptor 74 was not as great an improvement as one might think. The Raptor is faster, but numerical comparison is not impressive. My PATA 7k250 loading XP in 33 seconds, the Raptor 74 in 30.
The drive is definitely snappier in practice, but it's hard to recommend the purchase to those that are not really picky. For most users a 7k250 or one of the new native SATA Maxtors will seem a better value. But at some point, after having exhausted all other application performance-enhancing options, the only way to build a faster computer (in everyday use) is to get a Raptor--cost-effective or not. Only you can decide if you are at that point.
In any event, I would not recommend the 36GB Raptor. The 74GB model is improved, it is that much less likely you would appreciate the improvement the 36GB would bring, given that even the 74 is not revolutionary in all cases.