Presler: Should VT (Virtualization Technology) be disabled ?

iamjcl · Feb 10, 2006

Presler: Should VT (Virtualization Technology) be disabled in BIOS ?

Having read only a little about VT, it appears of no real value at this point, at least in the typical home-use role.

Haven't tried it, but has anyone disabled it in BIOS, and seen any change in OC results ?

For that matter, any of the other settings under the "CPU" page ?

- Chris

RangerXLT8 · Feb 10, 2006

iamjcl said:
Having read only a little about VT, it appears of no real value at this point, at least in the typical home-use role.

Haven't tried it, but has anyone disabled it in BIOS, and seen any change in OC results ?

For that matter, any of the other settings under the "CPU" page ?

- Chris

I'm running with it disabled, it offers nothing usefull to me so there is no need to have it running. If you're not going to use it, then disable it.

Genghis · Feb 10, 2006

VT is only for those of us wanting to run virtual machines. So if you're not running Xen or VMware Server, you don't need it. I am curious, however, if VT causes any performance penalty for regular apps. If anyone tries some benchmarks with and without VT, please post your results here!

iamjcl · Feb 10, 2006

... Disabled it, and notice absolutely no change in any OC potential.

- Chris

Presler: Should VT (Virtualization Technology) be disabled ?

iamjcl

Member

RangerXLT8

Member

Genghis

Registered

iamjcl

Member

Similar threads