• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

New Build Bottleneck?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Shootist

Registered
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Never OC'd before but thought I might check it out. Build is for Crysis, COD4, video editing and surfing. Anything not look right? If I have a bottleneck anywhere, what is it and how bad?

Rosewill R5601-bk Case
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16811147038

Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 Conroe
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16819115029

GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS4 Rev. 2.0
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16813128064

Crucial Ballistix 2GB DDR2 800
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16820146565

EVGA GeForce 8800GT 512MB
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16814130318

OCZ GameXStream 700W
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16817341002

(2) Western Digital 160GB SATA 3.0GB/s
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16822136062

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
http://www.newegg.com/product/produc...82E16832116400

Maybe I'm asking to late because I already got the PSU and Memory and ordered the Case and Motherboard.

Shootist
 
yep looks awesome, i would get 4gb though, but thats just me, for video editing it would be usefull... games too i guesS:)
 
I would chose the new Seagate 7200.11 or the older 7200.10 over WD. (Personal Preference, WD+ Seagate are tier 1)

Also- Why two of the same drive? Are you planning on using RAID0 or just extra storage?
 
Last edited:
You guessed it, mainly storage. My Avid Express DV editing software recommends the software on one drive and media on another.


I've been kinda tossed on the HD. I've used WD before and it has always been solid. Seagate seems to have a higher failier rate. Of course those with problems talk louder than those that don't.


Thanks for the help/info guys.
Shootist
 
You guessed it, mainly storage. My Avid Express DV editing software recommends the software on one drive and media on another.


I've been kinda tossed on the HD. I've used WD before and it has always been solid. Seagate seems to have a higher failier rate. Of course those with problems talk louder than those that don't.


Thanks for the help/info guys.
Shootist


I've seen more dead WD's than I have Seagates. Of course, these are primairliy drives >10 years old So it may not be accurate. However, I had a friend's WD drive croak randomly. In fact, When I was trying to diagnose the issue, I suspected a board failure. Sure enough, when I removed the board (You can take the control board off of a hdd w/o problems) there were several _fried_ traces and a dead chip (It had a burned through spot)


Moral of the story? Any HDD can die.
Solution? Put your new HDD's through their paces. Stress them all you can: full format(not quick), benchmarks, and check for bad sectors regularly until they are ~6 months old. After that period of time I've not seen a drive die for years and years. I've got 15 year old WD's and Seagates.
 
I've seen more dead WD's than I have Seagates. Of course, these are primairliy drives >10 years old So it may not be accurate. However, I had a friend's WD drive croak randomly. In fact, When I was trying to diagnose the issue, I suspected a board failure. Sure enough, when I removed the board (You can take the control board off of a hdd w/o problems) there were several _fried_ traces and a dead chip (It had a burned through spot)


Moral of the story? Any HDD can die.
Solution? Put your new HDD's through their paces. Stress them all you can: full format(not quick), benchmarks, and check for bad sectors regularly until they are ~6 months old. After that period of time I've not seen a drive die for years and years. I've got 15 year old WD's and Seagates.

Not a bad idea to stress test them that way. As another data point I've had tons of drives fail after 2-3 years of solid service. It's just the state of the world with mechanical drives. Gotta backup early and often.
 
Back