1045t vs fx6300

[frederic2707]

Is the 1045t black edition better than the fx 6300 because i heard that the x6 processors where killed by amd to raise bulldozer and piledriver salea i can get a new 145t be 40 euros cheaper than the 6300 should i buy the 6300 or the 1045t i can afford either so that is not the problem if the 1045t is less good is the 1100t better than the 6300 and does someone know where to find a cheap 1100t

 

[Xenohitsu]

Is the 1045t black edition better than the fx 6300 because i heard that the x6 processors where killed by amd to raise bulldozer and piledriver salea i can get a new 145t be 40 euros cheaper than the 6300 should i buy the 6300 or the 1045t i can afford either so that is not the problem if the 1045t is less good is the 1100t better than the 6300 and does someone know where to find a cheap 1100t

IMO the 1045t is a good deal if you can overclock it to just 2.9ghz or 3.0ghz. The 1100t, at least in the U.S. costs $30-40 more than the 1090t, which was also a Black Edition, and for that price or lower you can get an 8320 or 8350. OC'ing the 6300 seems better than the 1090t, but depends on how much you want to OC it, plus the higher electric bill might add up.

 

[trents]

Fully overclocked, the FX 6300 will outperform the 1045t for gaming purposes. The FX 6300 will overclock higher. If you use the computer mostly for audio video rendering or CAD then the 1045t might be better because it has six true physical cores. The question would be whether or not your motherboard would stand up to a significant overclock of the FX 6300. The ASRock 970 Ex 3 does not have a heavy duty power phase component and the FX CPUs really suck the juice when overclocked.

 

[Xenohitsu]

If you use the computer mostly for audio video rendering or CAD then the 1045t might be better because it has six true physical cores.

I'm so glad I have a 1065t phenom II X6. I forgot about that.