- Joined
- Nov 28, 2001
Many people upgrade their rigs right about the time a new OS comes along (shady advertising and such) so they get the OS for free,
8.1 wasn't pushed as much as 8 was on release, since it was just a update. At the time, 8 had such a bad rep, that OEMs were offering free "downgrades" to 7 (which was advertised heavily too), even though M$ was trying to force the OEMs to offer only 8 on new systems. I think the switch from 8 to 7 was in the 30-40% range of every new computer purchased (desktops and laptops, phones not included). But you are correct, as the prevalence of 8 was due more to new sales of hardware then upgrades. Still, 7 reigned supreme, with many not having a easy (free) way of updating to 8/8.1 even if they wanted to then, and now.
In our current day and time i would think that very few people (average joe) would actually fork out £220 for Windows as a stand-alone product without something else to sweeten the deal unless they know absolutely nothing about computers.
We here on this forum are not average joes. We are not the norm or the standard. Don't think your level of understanding of computers is the same as everyone else. The true average joe really truely knows nearly nothing about computers, especially in this day and age when everything about computers is simply plug it in, and it runs. The true average joe also doesn't update often, especially when it'll cost them. This is one of the reasons M$ did the free update push, and one of the reasons it's pushing 10 so much with it's forced updates, to get the average joe to actually update.