far far away said:
thx reefa, but i really don't know what to do next.... everybody can run 1:1 min. 240Mhz, only i can't!
damn....
Thanks for that thread Reefa, never seen it before. It's a refreshing upside to the usual bunch of guys claiming they can run 289-295 synch, 1T.
While your threshold of 240 does seem a little low Far, I question the true stability of a lot of these high overclocks. Been flogging the MSI board for a week, and fortunately for me, I found a gem of a 3000+ which does 300x9, rock stable on the CPU, at 1.525-1.55 volts. This CPU is a good ram tester.
Things get squirrely >270 using 2x512 at 1T, depending on the ram and mem controller of the CPU. Passing all four 'Marks is an achievement up >280. Even then, run a long 3D demo like SS2nd Encounter and the IL-2 demo and you may kick to the desktop. It's the same 5:4 instability of P4 rigs.
My early set of PQI TCCD run 275, 3-3-3-6 with a 3200+, but won't go above 266 on the 3000+, however it can run 2.5-3-3-6 there. Best I can do that is 257 on the 3200+. Some guys can run 2.5-4-4-6 to get more mileage out of TCCD, mine doesn't like those timings.
Your -5B Cs may max out at 240 at 2.85 volts. I know on the IS7 board with 2.8 VDIMM it maxes at 245 or so, 2x512s.
Max I can do at 2x512, 1T is 283 with my Vitesta PC4000. That's benching all four 'Marks. I have some GSKill PC4400 on the way, and I will be picking up Vitesta PC600 soon in Japan. I doubt I will be able to run 300x9, 1:1 on the ram, depending on the mem controller of my 3000+, but who knows. I know damn sure that PC600 has more headroom than my PC500 Vitesta
.
I still get a 32 sec SuperPI 1M time at 300x9 (2700 mhz) with the 133 divider so my ram is only at 200 mhz, 2-3-3-6! Can't complain about that.