- Joined
- Sep 7, 2013
Typical impression from the average Joe:
Hehehe i see what you did there
I have skimmed through the past few pages, is there a definite release date?
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Typical impression from the average Joe:
Hehehe i see what you did there
I have skimmed through the past few pages, is there a definite release date?
Heh, its not my fault there are some that can/do and some that can't/don't... I can and do.And yet you look and the masses and despair
If you think this is shady, I wonder what you think of all the AMD hype that was released before they fell flat...going on your thinking are they the anti-christ?
Nah. But he does write their drivers.....
I'll be waiting for the 1080 Ti then I'll be buying in. It's going to be very interesting to see what the ungimped version can do. BTW, billions of dollars of R & D is just
I do... yes. The 1080Ti will reportedly have HBM2. There is a production shortage of HBM2 and both AMD and NVIDIA will be using that memory. I would expect the 1080Ti to come out in early 2017 unless AMD comes out with a hell of a card in Vega come fall which may have NVIDIA bring the 1080Ti to us earlier.
Yes fair enough for that but i'm curious to exactly what scenario/benchmark it was 7x faster, or is it one of those things that will never again be mentioned ? This is like going to a store, you ask for a GPU for games and the clerk says "the company that makes this GPU says its up to 10x faster then yours" (never mentions in what ground its faster). Ok party in my pants and all that, you take it home and it does around 20% higher. Whats the 1st thing that goes through your mind ?
curious...there was a big difference between the two...The above sounds like my experience "upgrading" from an ATI 9800 Pro to an X850xt. The differences were negligible in all the games I could bench.
20-25% better is where I expected it. That's going to put the 1070 around titanX if I had to guess, if not a bit faster...some 'unconfirmed' benchmarks are leaking out now:
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-3dmark-firestrike-benchmarks/
Seems to be very promising. As previously expected ~20-25% better than Titan X.
Overclocking gives very high boosts it seems too.
There were some DX12 benchmarks out in the wild this week as well, AOTS. I dont think the gains were that huge there though. Still clearly the most powerful GPU available though!
Only need to wait till Tuesday to get a slew of gaming benchmarks and probably some good overclocking tests.
This time we only have FireStrike scores. According to the leaker GTX 1080 was running at 2114 MHz clock, which is roughly 381 MHz more than stock 1733 MHz boost clock. This is the first time new Pascal GP104-based graphics cards shows its true potential. We are observing a substantial boost in performance, GTX 1080 has 152/161/161% of GTX TITAN X stock performance in FireStrike Performance/Extreme and Ultra respectively.
Alright, let me pose a scenario...
You get a new GPU and compare it to your old GPU.
The same benchmark is run on both GPU's.
In your result, the performance is double.
What is your new GPU in comparison to the old one? It is twice as fast.
This is what nVidia is saying. They never said it was twice as fast at all times in all scenarios.
Your cynicism is completely unfounded and the more you spew it the more frivolous your posts become.
If you don't want to believe what they are saying has truth then wait until the embargo runs out, get a card, and do some empirical testing yourself.
I made this my point because I'm Honest person that can see shady or hype people with a agenda. So when the reviews are out we will see if what Nvidia said is hyp. From my prospective what I see here people are fine with fudging the truth or also called a lie, I just cant believe it.Well maybe PC industry will change if we all call the PC advertising hype or shady so they will be more honest.
Nvidia said the GTX 1080 is double the performance of titan X and they did not say how, that is shady or hyp since they don't say what it is double in. Unless the 1080 is double in any gaming bench marks then they are telling the truth, that is what a video card is fore.
I made this my point because I'm Honest person that can see shady or hype people with a agenda. So when the reviews are out we will see if what Nvidia said is hyp. From my prospective what I see here people are fine with fudging the truth or also called a lie, I just cant believe it.
I'm not the bad guy here spewing in the wind, I'm Honest hard working person and Gaming is a hobby, not a job to research what value I'm paying fore.
Any definitive news about SLI ability with the 9xx cards? I don't want to ditch my GTX970 unless I absolutely have to. I am loath to go SLI, unless the 970's drop to the $200 mark.
Any definitive news about SLI ability with the 9xx cards? I don't want to ditch my GTX970 unless I absolutely have to. I am loath to go SLI, unless the 970's drop to the $200 mark.
If you only play dx12 games I think you could seeing as you can combine amd and nvidia gpus idk how all that works though
He did not say that, we interpret the chart with a close look and compare it to what he says. I just wish marketing was not so bad and they would of just waited till NDA was lifted then did the conference at the same time. Sorry for getting carried away it's tough world, survival of the fittest.Edit: To add to this, again, the 2X performance claim you continually cite (ad nauseam) is in reference to only VR content.