- Joined
- Nov 16, 2002
- Location
- Neenah, WI
So I bought this card: http://www.monoprice.com/products/p...=10407&cs_id=1040702&p_id=2667&seq=1&format=2 a couple of weeks ago and installed it. Initially I planned on running a Raid 5 config with 4 WD 3200AALS hard drives. I set the RAID 5 up and when I was copying data to it I noticed it was going obnoxiously slow. So I benched it with HD Tune and it said the transfer rate was about 10MB/s average with something like 21% cpu usage (I know the cpu usage is probably pretty close to what it should be with software raid, but figured I'd include the info for reference).
I thought it might have been because of the raid 5, but my buddy tested his 3 drive raid 5 and he was getting around 80+/- MB/s transfer using his onboard Intel Matrix raid. So I thought maybe it was just that the card was a piece, so I removed the drives from the array and went to 4 seperate drives instead. This helped, but I'm still benching (as well as realworld) at 20MB/s +/- average transfer rate (read as well as write).
I tried updating the drivers to the most current ones, this did not help. I've read about some performance issues with this chipset, but it seems that people are still getting much higher transfer rates than I am. Any ideas why this would be performing so slow? I know it's PCI and whatnot, but even being PCI I would expect to see at least 60MB/s. I mean, common, I'm getting 20+ MB/s transfer rate through usb 2.0.
My current system config =
Abit IP35, bios is the most current
E4300 @ 3.87ghz
4gb DDR2
Vista x64
Drive config:
Connected to IP35's onboard SATA ports:
WD 74gb Raptor (benched at 60MB/s average transfer)
Seagate 500gb 16mb cache (benched at 63MB/s transfer)
WD 3200KS
WD 3200AALS (Same as the drives connected to the raid controller...This one benched at around 80MB/s average transfer)
Liteon 16x SATA DVDRW
Connected to the PCI Raid card:
WD 3200AALS
WD 3200AALS
WD 3200AALS
WD 3200AALS
This is ticking me off since the whole reason I decided to go with internal drives was because I do a lot of large file transfers back and forth to different drives. I know buying a better card would probably solve my problems, but I'm a bit strapped for cash at the moment (just upgraded my computer as well as car repairs and christmas lol). So any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
I thought it might have been because of the raid 5, but my buddy tested his 3 drive raid 5 and he was getting around 80+/- MB/s transfer using his onboard Intel Matrix raid. So I thought maybe it was just that the card was a piece, so I removed the drives from the array and went to 4 seperate drives instead. This helped, but I'm still benching (as well as realworld) at 20MB/s +/- average transfer rate (read as well as write).
I tried updating the drivers to the most current ones, this did not help. I've read about some performance issues with this chipset, but it seems that people are still getting much higher transfer rates than I am. Any ideas why this would be performing so slow? I know it's PCI and whatnot, but even being PCI I would expect to see at least 60MB/s. I mean, common, I'm getting 20+ MB/s transfer rate through usb 2.0.
My current system config =
Abit IP35, bios is the most current
E4300 @ 3.87ghz
4gb DDR2
Vista x64
Drive config:
Connected to IP35's onboard SATA ports:
WD 74gb Raptor (benched at 60MB/s average transfer)
Seagate 500gb 16mb cache (benched at 63MB/s transfer)
WD 3200KS
WD 3200AALS (Same as the drives connected to the raid controller...This one benched at around 80MB/s average transfer)
Liteon 16x SATA DVDRW
Connected to the PCI Raid card:
WD 3200AALS
WD 3200AALS
WD 3200AALS
WD 3200AALS
This is ticking me off since the whole reason I decided to go with internal drives was because I do a lot of large file transfers back and forth to different drives. I know buying a better card would probably solve my problems, but I'm a bit strapped for cash at the moment (just upgraded my computer as well as car repairs and christmas lol). So any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!