- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
Hi, Folks!
[Please accept my apologies for the arresting title. This problem has now been fixed. I'd accidentally run the wrong version of PiFast! Thanks to Gautam for the help!]
No, I'm not trying to improve my score. Quite the opposite! However, I was just shocked by receiving the #1 worldwide rank for Q6600s in PiFast(!), and I'm now worried that I've done something wrong. I mean, it'd be terrific if I really won, but I'm quite skeptical about that. It's really important to me that if anything isn't kosher, that I fix this before anyone thinks that I've cheated.
When I run PiFast, I enter the Chudnovsky method (i.e. the default fastest), 10000000 (10M) for digits, an FFT size of 1024, no compression, etc, yet I've gotten some really great numbers running PiFast43. Can anyone think of what I may have done wrong? Am I somehow running the wrong version?
I can only see one thing that's different on my screens. When I look at other folks' posts, I see a memory allocation of 61372K, yet on my runs, I see an allocation of 61757K. As with other folks, the index is 705226. I've checked the first post to see if it has any hints, and all I see is that it apparently incorrectly asks for us to benchmark 1M digits, instead of 10M digits, as we all seem to be doing.
Here's a copy of my post image, if anyone has any suggestions:
By the way, the numbers are repeatable, so it wasn't a fluke. I'd greatly appreciate it if anyone can suggest what might have happened here. Please accept my apologies for not posting this in the PiFast thread - my goal was to get quicker attention here. What did I do wrong? THANK YOU for any help you can provide me!!!
Sincerely,
Mark
[Please accept my apologies for the arresting title. This problem has now been fixed. I'd accidentally run the wrong version of PiFast! Thanks to Gautam for the help!]
No, I'm not trying to improve my score. Quite the opposite! However, I was just shocked by receiving the #1 worldwide rank for Q6600s in PiFast(!), and I'm now worried that I've done something wrong. I mean, it'd be terrific if I really won, but I'm quite skeptical about that. It's really important to me that if anything isn't kosher, that I fix this before anyone thinks that I've cheated.
When I run PiFast, I enter the Chudnovsky method (i.e. the default fastest), 10000000 (10M) for digits, an FFT size of 1024, no compression, etc, yet I've gotten some really great numbers running PiFast43. Can anyone think of what I may have done wrong? Am I somehow running the wrong version?
I can only see one thing that's different on my screens. When I look at other folks' posts, I see a memory allocation of 61372K, yet on my runs, I see an allocation of 61757K. As with other folks, the index is 705226. I've checked the first post to see if it has any hints, and all I see is that it apparently incorrectly asks for us to benchmark 1M digits, instead of 10M digits, as we all seem to be doing.
Here's a copy of my post image, if anyone has any suggestions:
By the way, the numbers are repeatable, so it wasn't a fluke. I'd greatly appreciate it if anyone can suggest what might have happened here. Please accept my apologies for not posting this in the PiFast thread - my goal was to get quicker attention here. What did I do wrong? THANK YOU for any help you can provide me!!!
Sincerely,
Mark
Last edited: